A boy needs one cloth. A girl needs two. Over time, more.

I have heard this answer across more than three decades of field research in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, across South Asia from women who had nothing to spare and no reason to be imprecise. It is not a statement about preference. It is an economic calculation. It contains more policy disappointment than any budget document I have read.

Budget 2026–27 has removed 18% sales tax on sanitary pads, menstrual products and contraceptives. A generation of young women candidly challenged enforced patriarchal positions on periods, bodies, autonomy, etc. These are now aggressively discoursed on social media platforms, and I am happy about it.

Thirty years after those field discussions, the cloth answer is unchanged. Technology has transformed. Social media has disrupted. The question worth asking is whether unfiltered reels have opened the talk without touching the structure beneath it or whether the visibility of some voices has made the invisibility of others easier to overlook.

What is the first real test of this announcement? Enforcement. The exemption exists in the Finance Bill, but its effect in the marketplace is not guaranteed.

Without active monitoring and enforcement of retail prices, manufacturers face no binding obligation to pass on the relief, meaning the promised savings may remain largely notional. Pakistan has a documented pattern of announcing fiscal relief that supply chains absorb silently. Without obligatory price accountability, this exemption will benefit balance sheets........

© The Express Tribune