Politicians often complain that people have lost faith in institutions. Governments lament declining trust. Public servants scratch their heads over cynicism.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Login or signup to continue reading

Yet perhaps the real mystery is not why trust is declining, but why anyone is surprised.

We live in an age where information has never been more accessible, where political decisions are scrutinised in real time, and where governments have whole departments dedicated to communication. Yet somehow, despite hearing more from our leaders than ever before, many Australians feel like they are being told less.

Not less information. Less truth. And that distinction matters.

Trust is not built by being right all the time. It is built by being honest, particularly when things have gone wrong.

Somewhere along the way, politics confused leadership with marketing.

Difficult decisions are no longer explained. They are sold.

Failures are not acknowledged. They are reframed.

Mistakes are not admitted. They are managed.

Political communication has become less about dialogue and more about risk mitigation. Every sentence is polished. Every statement tested. Every word filtered through advisers whose job is not necessarily to tell the truth, but to minimise political damage.

The result is a language that sounds increasingly detached from ordinary life.

Programs are "optimised".

Services are "restructured".

Mistakes are not made; "lessons are learned".

Nobody is responsible. Nobody apologises. Nobody appears to own anything.

And yet citizens see the consequences all around them.

Perhaps this is why fictional politicians continue to resonate more deeply than many real ones.

One of the most memorable scenes in The West Wing occurs during a town hall meeting. A farmer confronts Governor Jed Bartlet about a vote that cost him money.

The expected political response would be a defensive explanation, a distraction, a........

© The Examiner