Why the Iran Poll Numbers Aren’t Really About Iran
Why the Iran Poll Numbers Aren’t Really About Iran
After Supreme Court Ruling, Tariff Refund Battle Just Beginning
Thanedar Claims GOP ‘Demonizing’ Illegal Immigrants With Trucking Ban Push
State Department Hotline Updated to Help Americans Escape Middle East, Leavitt Says
Thanedar Claims GOP ‘Demonizing’ Illegal Immigrants With Trucking Ban Push
Immigration Enforcement Saves Lives
Democrat Who Compared ICE to the Stasi Faces Ethics Complaint Over Program to Report Feds
PoliticsSecurityNews
EXCLUSIVE: New GOP Bill Looks to ‘Deliver Justice’ for 5-Year-Old Struck by Illegal Alien Truck Driver
US Military Power Does Not Match Threat Level, Report Finds
InternationalCommentary
Next Steps for the US-Guyana Strategic Partnership
InternationalCommentary
Cracking Down on China’s Trade Cheating the Right Way
Time for Denmark and the United States to Secure Greenland
Thanedar Claims GOP ‘Demonizing’ Illegal Immigrants With Trucking Ban Push
Fetterman Joins GOP to Block Iran War Powers Effort
Democrats Take Heat Over ‘Fake Sympathy’ for Angel Families in Noem Hearing
PoliticsSecurityNews
EXCLUSIVE: Congress Eyes New ‘Dalilah’s Law’ Proposal to Ban Illegal Immigrants From Trucking
What Just Happened in Indiana Could Reshape How Schools Teach—and Test—Students
Why Is Virginia’s Redistricting Referendum on Pause?
Georgia Voters Support SAVE America Act—Even as State’s Democrat Senators Oppose It
Ohio Voters Send a ‘Clear Message’ With Support for SAVE America Act Provisions
US Looks to Gain ‘Complete Control’ of Iran’s Skies
On Iran, House Members Draw Battle Lines After Classified Briefing
Hegseth: Iran Strikes ‘Not Iraq,’ ‘Not Endless’
BREAKING: Trump Says Khamenei Is Dead. What Happens Now in Iran?
International Commentary
Russia Operating ‘Systematic Child Abduction Operation,’ EU Ambassador Says
Meet the People Fueling Chaos in Minneapolis, New York, and Beyond
OH BABY! Couples Could Make Big Money on Trump Accounts
What Comes Next for Venezuela? State Department Official Explains
Victor Davis Hanson: Trump Laid Out America’s Comeback While Democrats Sat Silent
International Commentary
Victor Davis Hanson: Another Iran Quagmire Might Mean Big Losses for Republicans in the Midterms
International Commentary
Victor Davis Hanson: The Real Reason Iran Won’t Negotiate
Victor Davis Hanson: Trump’s Cost-Benefit Analysis for Striking Iran
Why the Iran Poll Numbers Aren’t Really About Iran
Win McNamee/Getty Images
Katherine Matt is an intern for The Daily Signal.
When it comes to Iran, Americans’ opinions aren’t necessarily reflective of what’s happening on the battlefield—but rather their feelings about President Donald Trump.
That’s according to veteran pollster Scott Rasmussen, founder of the Napolitan Institute.
As the conflict intensifies in the Middle East, Rasmussen said his polling suggests that Americans’ views on Iran appear to be driven less by U.S. military action and more by their broader opinions of Trump.
Trump’s Job Approval vs. Iran Strikes
At a Wednesday briefing, Rasmussen said public reaction to the unfolding situation in Iran has remained stable since Saturday—and is similar to Trump’s overall job approval numbers.
When voters were asked whether they approve or disapprove of the way the president is handling the situation in Iran, 42% said they approve. That figure is close to Trump’s overall job approval rating of 45% in the same polling.
42% approve of President Trump's handling of the situation in Iran, and 49% do not.40% approve of the attacks on Iran.https://t.co/IFGhT98fZ31,000 RV by @ScottWRasmussen pic.twitter.com/fHdD5wyIS7— Napolitan News Service (@NapolitanNews) March 4, 2026
42% approve of President Trump's handling of the situation in Iran, and 49% do not.40% approve of the attacks on Iran.https://t.co/IFGhT98fZ31,000 RV by @ScottWRasmussen pic.twitter.com/fHdD5wyIS7
The consistency in Rasmussen’s surveys indicates that opinions on Iran are tracking closely with existing political opinions of Trump—rather than shifting in response to news headlines.
Only 32% of voters say they are following news about Iran “very closely,” underscoring another key finding: most Americans are not immersed in the details of military strategy or regional politics.
As Rasmussen noted, few voters consider themselves military experts, and that reality may help explain why public opinion has shown little change since Saturday’s strikes.
Polling Remains Unchanged
Polling conducted Saturday afternoon—immediately after news broke of U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran—found that 40% of voters favored the strikes. Days later, after extensive news coverage, that number has not changed.
Support remains at 40%, according to the Napolitan Institute’s latest survey.
Opposition also moved only marginally. Initially, 46% said they opposed the attacks. That number has since moved up by just one percentage point.
In other words, despite intense media focus, public sentiment has barely shifted.
Expectation of Victory
One area where Rasmussen did observe some movement was on expectations of success.
On Saturday, 55% of voters said they believed it was likely the mission would succeed in bringing about regime change in Iran. That number has since fallen five percentage points to 50%.
Rasmussen, however, emphasized that this shift does not represent a collapse in confidence. Rather than moving from optimism to pessimism, respondents appear to have shifted into a more uncertain category—from believing success is likely to saying they are unsure what will happen next.
The broader picture remains steady. Iran is not reshaping public opinion—it’s reflecting it.
Ultimately, Rasmussen argued, public opinion will hinge on outcomes. If the mission produces significant change, removes what many view as a destabilizing regime, and does so with minimal American casualties and limited cost, voters are likely to judge it positively. If not, the political consequences in the midterms could be significant.
Rasmussen noted that Trump has only a couple of weeks before he begins to lose support, with 55% of voters opposed to him sending U.S. troops to the ground. If something drastic happens, such as a rise in U.S. casualties, Trump’s support for Iran could lessen even quicker.
For now, however, the numbers suggest that Americans are viewing events in Iran largely through a domestic political lens—and the perception of the president himself continues to shape reactions more than developments in the headlines.
Death Toll in Iran Protests Could Be ‘Thousands’
Hegseth Responds to Reports War With Iran Is Imminent
What Is ‘Operation Epic Fury’—and How Far Will the Iran Operation Go?
Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE
Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.
The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.
In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.
You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.
The Tony Kinnett Cast
The Daily Signal Podcast
© 2025 The Daily Signal Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
We use cookies on our website. By using our website, you consent to cookies. Learn More .
