Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.

In a lacy pink church dress and flowery pink sweater, her gray-blond hair clipped back with a heart-shaped bobby pin and pearls peeking through her sweater’s neckline, the penis grandma of Fairhope, Alabama, watched as a parade of witnesses testified that she wasn’t a threat to the community.

That fact was obvious if you had watched the viral video that had bestowed the 62-year-old woman with several phallic nicknames. But somehow, Renea Gamble had found herself a criminal defendant, accused of posing a danger to her peaceful Southern city.

Gamble’s trial was a major event in this town, and for good reason. Gamble had briefly been the subject of national attention in October, after she was wrestled to the ground by several police officers for wearing a 7-foot-tall flesh-colored inflatable penis costume to a No Kings protest. Gamble had showed up to the demonstration with an American flag and a sign that read “No Dick Tators.” The viral video picks up with an officer, soon to be joined by two more, pinning a giant penis to the ground, a pair of legs protruding, limp, from underneath the testicles. “This is a family town,” the arresting officer tells jeering onlookers as he and the two others handcuff Gamble. “I’m not going to have someone out here dressed like this.”

Six months after that incident, the woman inside the costume was facing criminal charges. After the arrest, the officers forced her into their SUV—the costume wouldn’t fit, so they had to stop and help her out of it first—and took her to jail. They slapped her with a disorderly conduct charge and let her out on bail. Then, as the weeks went on, the city added more: resisting arrest, violating a city ordinance about breaching the peace, and providing false information. (Gamble had given her name as “Aunt Tifa” when the officer asked.) She was looking at up to six months in jail.

In the video’s limited aperture, Gamble’s arrest alongside a suburban highway could have been anywhere. But when I first saw it on social media, I was shocked: To me, this wasn’t Anytown, USA. It was home.

Fairhope, Alabama, is the most elegant city in the county where I grew up. It’s an oasis for arts, tasteful wealth, and Southern manners in one of the reddest parts of the country. It’s a place where people pause to chat up strangers on oak-and-magnolia-draped streets, a place where boutiques sell smocked baby dresses and shirts with phrases such as “Pearls Are Always Appropriate.” The city’s most memorable political dustup, several people told me, was the time, in 2006, when a Walmart came to the outskirts of town; some 1,000 Fairhopians who thought it would disrupt the “village feel” lined up and held hands in protest. In other words, it’s not a city where cops rough up grandmothers. And it’s not somewhere grandmothers wear 7-foot penises in the first place.

So I found myself in attendance at Gamble’s trial because I had some burning questions about this whole phallic debacle. Since the start of the Trump era, we’ve become all too familiar with the nastiest mudslinging version of politics. But over the years, Fairhope, a city of about 23,000, seemed to be one of those rare places where there was still some decorum in politics. Although it’s hard to know how Fairhope itself votes, as the city’s elections are nonpartisan, its county is deep red. And yet Fairhope was one of the few cities in the state to successfully fend off a full assault from the anti-woke activist organization Moms for Liberty, seemingly affronted by the group’s ugliness. It defended its library against a muscular book-banning crusade and rejected the group’s candidates for local office. I had thought that Fairhope, which some call “Mayberry by the Bay,” was a place where real Southern gentility had survived. What had happened to make a city with a reputation for grace and good sense suddenly come down so hard on a protesting grandmother with a clear First Amendment defense?

Had the culture wars finally worn down the last of the city’s reserves of strength, causing even the most genteel Southern town to snap into MAGA tribalism? And, my biggest question: Had the Trump years radicalized the polite elderly ladies of south Alabama—the demographic that I thought would die from shame before upsetting anyone on either side of the aisle?

To find these answers, I wanted to see how Fairhope responded to Gamble’s trial. From that, I thought, I’d understand whether the Trump years had corrupted one of the most charming places in the country. Or if the spirit of Southern hospitality—the attitude that had caused the adults in my life to tell me to “stop being ugly” anytime I had harsh words for someone as a child—was one of the few forces more powerful than the boorishness of our political moment.

Gamble’s trial, on a sunny Wednesday in mid-April, had drawn an unusually large crowd of about 80 or so outside the municipal court building. There were reporters, a political cartoonist for Alabama’s largest newspaper network, and a sizable number of cheerful and largely gray-haired protesters holding signs such as “Free speech shouldn’t be so hard to swallow” (illustrated with a banana) and “Don’t be a meanie, it’s just a weenie!” One woman in her 60s, Mary Kay Smith, was wearing an eggplant costume. The energy was slightly festive, lightened by the absurdity of the situation. I heard one Gamble supporter joke to another: “So should I call the cops every time I see truck nuts?” Gamble’s attorney, David Gespass, had already reminded me that morning that this was not a laughing matter for Gamble, who was facing jail time.

Six months earlier, watching the video of the officers grappling the giant puffy penis, I would have never imagined that the city would seek to punish that woman in a court of law. It seemed likely that the prosecution would ease up in person, recognizing the silliness of it all. That wasn’t what happened.

Once the judge, facing the audience from the front of a council room repurposed to accommodate the unusual crowd, invited the lawyers to make opening statements, it didn’t take long to see that the prosecution wouldn’t bring any joviality to its case. There was indeed a casualness to the scene: Because of the unusual council chambers setting, the two attorneys—Gespass in a suit and “We the People” Constitution-print tie; the prosecution in a more relaxed slacks-and-blazer look, occasionally leaning one elbow comfortably against the chamber desk—hovered around the dais where the judge presided. But the main witness, the police officer who had initially confronted Gamble, was grim-faced, rigidly polite, and completely serious about his claims. And as soon as officer Andrew Babb........

© Slate