menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Endorsement: Prop 44 uses California’s most vulnerable patients as cannon fodder

18 0
19.09.2026

On its surface, everything about Proposition 44 on California’s November ballot looks appealing. 

Its title is straightforward: “Requires community health clinics spend 90% of revenue on program services.” 

And the text of the measure boldly declares its intent to “ensure clinic patient service delivery and workforce stability is prioritized over management and overhead spending.” 

Endorsement: San Franciscans voted to put their bloated commission system on a diet. Prop A is the start

Endorsement: The Bay Area cannot function without public transit. Yes on the Regional Transit Measure

Endorsement: The way S.F. does business is broken. Prop E would rein in the waste

Prop 37 endorsement: Buying a home in California can feel impossible. Is this the fix?

Article continues below this ad

Great. After all, these clinics, which are largely funded by taxpayers, provide low-cost or free care to uninsured and low-income residents in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Given the huge looming federal cuts to healthcare, why wouldn’t Californians vote to ensure limited dollars are spent on services for vulnerable patients, rather than administrative bloat or padding executives’ salaries?

Well, because Prop 44 will almost certainly make things worse for patient care.

The details are wonky, but you don’t have to dig deep to spot the farce.

Prop 44 would establish strict spending requirements for a subset of community health clinics known as “federally qualified health centers” run by private nonprofits that are already subject to extensive federal regulations. The measure would mandate these clinics spend at least 90% of their revenue on things related to their nonprofit “mission” — i.e., patient care — and a maximum of 10% on management and administrative expenses, including fundraising. 

Article continues below this ad

“We are just trying to ensure that when these federal health cuts really hit, that these clinics are ready and that they can stay open and operational for the people who need them,” rather than “spending money on extravagant fundraisers, on excessive executive pay,” Renée Saldaña, press secretary of Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, the union........

© San Francisco Chronicle