Charlebois: If we don’t reform supply management, Washington will do it for us
Share this Story : PNI Atlantic News Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Charlebois: If we don’t reform supply management, Washington will do it for us
Whether Canada likes it or not, tariffs are now the new American trajectory
The U.S. Supreme Court was unequivocal: The tariffs imposed under the Trump administration were unconstitutional in their legal rationale. That distinction matters. The court did not declare tariffs themselves illegitimate. It rejected the justification used to impose them.
Subscribe now to access this story and more:
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Subscribe or sign in to your account to continue your reading experience.
Unlimited access to the website and app
Exclusive access to premium content, newsletters and podcasts
Full access to the e-Edition app, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists
Create an account or sign in to continue your reading experience.
Access additional stories every month
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in our commenting community
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
In response, President Donald Trump invoked Article 122 and imposed a blanket 15% tariff on all goods entering the United States. The signal could not be clearer: Tariffs are not going away. They are being re-engineered.
Since early 2025, Washington has collected roughly $130 billion in tariff revenues. The court offered no guidance on what should happen to those funds. Thousands of American companies will undoubtedly challenge their assessments, but the broader message from the court — particularly reflected in Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s dissent — is that tariffs are likely to remain a structural feature of U.S. trade policy, regardless of who occupies the White House.
This decision was not partisan theatre. A Republican-dominated court ruled against a Republican president. That adds credibility. The ruling was procedural, not philosophical. The White House now has 150 days to construct a more defensible economic and legal framework to justify tariffs — and it will. The American........
