Diplomacy is no stranger to contradiction, but every now and then, the global order outdoes itself. One such moment unfolded this week: Pakistan is set to chair the United Nations Security Council’s Taliban Sanctions Committee and serve as vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee in 2025.

Yes, the same Pakistan that has for years been flagged by multiple countries for sheltering terrorist groups. The same nation where Osama bin Laden was found living quietly in Abbottabad, not far from a military academy. The announcement has triggered understandable disbelief among security observers, policymakers, and victims of terrorism worldwide.

The Taliban Sanctions Committee is no minor body, nor is it a ceremonial role. It deals with critical global measures — from asset freezes, travel bans, arms embargoes on individuals and groups threatening peace in Afghanistan, targeting those affiliated with the Taliban and other groups threatening peace in Afghanistan.

Giving this role to Pakistan, a country that has been repeatedly accused of offering safe haven to extremist networks, raises a troubling question: how can the global watchdog for terror allow a state under suspicion to lead the very committees meant to rein in such behaviour?

To be clear, Pakistan’s appointment is procedural. As a non-permanent member of the Security Council for 2025–26, it is entitled to chair certain committees. But processes, however technical, do not operate in a vacuum. Context matters. And the context here is not flattering.

Barely........

© News9Live