Opinion: Pakistan Feels The Indus Squeeze, India Left $100 Billion In The River

Eighteen months after abeyance, river data show a lever that unsettles Pakistan without changing its conduct, and an India that left six decades of power and water unrealised

Got Question about the News?

When India placed the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance on April 23, 2025, the day after 26 people were murdered at Pahalgam, the logic fitted in one line: blood and water cannot flow together.

The condition was just as precise. The treaty would stay suspended until Pakistan “credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism." Eighteen months on, that sentence deserves an audit, not an anniversary.

Leading Light | How To Grow Your ACC, The Brain Muscle That Builds Emotional Strength

Pakistan Recycles Kashmir Rhetoric To UN Chief Even As Country Faces Economic Collapse, Local Tension | Exclusive

Pakistan’s Maximum Pressure Policy Uses Afghan Migrants, Students & Transit Routes: Muttaqi At Moscow Meet | Exclusive

J&K Tech Threat: How Sat Communication Infra Raises Security Concerns For Counter-Terror Ops | Exclusive

At Jala Monitor, we start from a simple premise: water is a relationship. For 65 years the treaty was the grammar of that relationship between India and Pakistan, and it outlasted three wars. India has now said the relationship carries consequences. Does the lever work? Has it changed Pakistan’s conduct, made Pakistan water-insecure, and made India more secure?

PAKISTAN HAS FELT IT, BUT HAS NOT CHANGED

Pakistan felt the pressure: its water secretary wrote to New Delhi four times within weeks, asking India to reconsider. But letters are not conduct. Infiltration attempts continued after Operation Sindoor; the Army chief said there had been “no let-up." In July 2026 the Home Ministry designated 23 more Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives as terrorists, among them Jaish’s launching commander for infiltration. Islamabad chose the courtroom instead: on 31 August 2026, a Court of Arbitration, whose jurisdiction India rejects, ruled the treaty still in force. Nothing in that record meets India’s........

© News18