One worrying tendency has become common in Bharatiya discourse: interpreting every new international instance through the prism of caste. Caste, undoubtedly, represents one of the most long-standing and violent forms of inequality in Bharat, but not all subjects will benefit from this interpretation. Interpreting every new instance through this prism can often distort a valid critique into something troubling, as identified. The notion that ChatGPT, an AI tool developed in accordance with international standards of technological development, represents domination by upper castes over lower castes is the most extreme form of this distortion. Just because this tool was developed according to international, rather than Bharatiya, technological principles, it represents domination by upper castes over lower castes, which is the most extreme form of distortion of all. Such a rather weak argumentation, by contrast, provides a quite rigorous and unconstrained critique of the narrative. This points out the flaws in those who correlate worldwide technological abilities with lower-caste identification, stresses the need for evidence in claims of beneficial repression, and reveals the politically beneficial character of defining lower-caste communities as permanent victims of technology, without accepting them as active technology users and developers. That argumentation does not defend corporate aid but defends intellectual integrity. To the degree to which technology criticism begins for the sake of intellectual integrity in the context of social justice ideas, reductionism and ideology have poor performance and existence. This argument about ChatGPT being nothing but........

© News18