They will tax billionaires today — guess who they’ll tax tomorrow
US News Metro Long Island Politics
Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA
Business Personal Finance
Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater
Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel
Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition
Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology
Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers
Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
They will tax billionaires today — guess who they’ll tax tomorrow
The most important thing about California’s proposed billionaire wealth tax is not that it targets billionaires.
It is that it creates a new pathway for Sacramento politicians to tax ordinary wealth in the future without going back to voters statewide.
That is the part voters need to understand before they get distracted by the campaign’s sales pitch.
Today, Californians have a critical protection: If the state wants to impose this kind of direct tax on wealth, it needs voter approval. This measure changes that.
It asks voters to approve a one-time 5% tax on the property of billionaires — but buried in the structure is something far broader. Once this authority exists, the legislature can build on it by a two-thirds vote.
And Democrats already control well over two-thirds of both houses of the California Legislature.
So the real question is not whether billionaires can afford it. The real question is whether voters are about to hand Sacramento new power over everyone’s net worth.
Backers of the measure say they have collected 1.5 million signatures, around twice the number needed to qualify for the November ballot. That makes this measure highly likely to appear before California voters.
The pitch will be simple: Billionaires have too much money, California has too many needs, and a 5% tax on extreme wealth is only fair.
That argument is politically useful, because it makes the measure sound........
