Hypocrite socialist Nithya Raman wants 88% more house
US News Metro Long Island Politics
Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA
Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater
Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel
Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition
Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology
Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers
Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
Hypocrite socialist Nithya Raman wants 88% more house
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Nithya Raman wants Los Angeles voters to make her mayor.
She also wants to bulldoze her 1,879-square-foot Silver Lake home and replace it with a three-story, 3,528-square-foot house with a spa and two-car garage.
That is an 88% increase in living space for a politician who has made housing affordability central to her political identity — and who is now the officially endorsed mayoral candidate of the Democratic Socialists of America’s Los Angeles chapter.
DSA-LA endorsed Raman on Sept. 2. She has been a member of the organization since before her first City Council campaign in 2020.
This stops being merely a story about a politician building herself a bigger house.
It becomes a story about hypocrisy.
There is nothing wrong with Raman wanting a bigger home. If she owns the property, can afford the project and follows the law, she should be free to improve it.
Private property means you get to make choices about something you own. You invest in it, improve it and shape it around the life you want to live.
Raman understands that perfectly well when the property belongs to Nithya Raman.
Her socialist allies see things differently when the property belongs to somebody else.
DSA-LA’s Democratic Socialist Program for Los Angeles promotes “decommodified housing” outside the private market and expressly calls for the government to “expropriate privately owned housing.”
That is not vague language.
And........
