menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Why I am fighting the ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ — and how the feds can help

10 0
24.08.2026

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

Why I am fighting the ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ — and how the feds can help

See more of our coverage in your search results.

The “Stop Nick Shirley Act” is a blatantly unconstitutional law that violates the freedom of the press.

That’s why I am asking the Civil Rights Division of the US Department of Justice to intervene to block its implementation.

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the controversial bill, AB 2624, into law despite knowing that there were serious objections to its violations of the First Amendment.

Proponents say it protects immigrants by shielding nonprofits that serve immigrants communities from supposed harassment.

What AB 2624 really does is shield these organizations from scrutiny, despite the fact that many of them receive public money. 

Specifically, Section 6218.19 of the legislation says:

“(b)(1) A program participant, or an individual, entity, or organization authorized to act on their behalf, may make a written demand to a person, business, or association to not publicly post or publicly display, disclose, or distribute on the Internet the personal information or image of the program participant. …

“(b)(4) A program participant whose personal information or image is made public as a result of a failure to honor a demand made pursuant to paragraph (1), or any individual, entity, or organization authorized to act on their........

© New York Post