US taxpayers should not have to fund DEI in California
US News Metro Long Island Politics
Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA
Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater
Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel
Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition
Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology
Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers
Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
US taxpayers should not have to fund DEI in California
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Judge William Orrick strikes again. The Barack Obama-appointed judge for the Northern District of California has blocked the Trump administration from cutting off federal grants to cities that use discriminatory “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) policies.
Think about that for a minute. A judge has ruled that American taxpayers have to keep giving grants to local governments that practice DEI, after the executive branch has determined the policy is both “illegal and immoral.”
DEI uses race, gender, sexuality and a variety of other labels to distinguish among Americans. Under Joe Biden, it became a legally sanctioned (or legally required) form of reverse discrimination.
Orrick says that the federal grants — which pay for a variety of public services — have nothing to do with the administration’s effort to end DEI.
But money is fungible. If a local government has federal money to cover fire safety, it can spend its own money on other things — like racial bean-counting and left-wing propaganda.
Orrick says that Congress, not the president, should control........
