menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Mandatory jail time for fraud vs. taxpayers? Absolutely

9 0
21.05.2026

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

Mandatory jail time for fraud vs. taxpayers? Absolutely

See more of our coverage in your search results.

Epic fraud, epic prison term. 

That sounds about right. 

California Rep. Ken Calvert this week announced a bill to require prison time of at least one year for fraud involving between $1 million and $5 million, and at least five years for fraud exceeding $5 million.

Good: Mandatory prison time for fraudsters is a sound idea.

While the federal government does impose minimum sentences for some forms of fraud, schemes that target federal health-care programs –– i.e., many cases in the news today –– generally don’t carry minimum jail terms.

Such minimums would give the feds another tool in the fight against fraud.

Mandatory jail time would ensure consequences, deliver some measure of justice, and boost deterrence for would-be grifters going forward.

No longer would brazen thieves plunder taxpayers with so little fear of repercussions that they scarcely cover their........

© New York Post