LA homeless policy: If this isn’t peak failure, what is?
US News Metro Long Island Politics
Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA
Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater
Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel
Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition
Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology
Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers
Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
LA homeless policy: If this isn’t peak failure, what is?
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Has LA homeless policy reached peak absurdity?
The California Post reported that a city homeless initiative championed by Councilwoman Nithya Raman has spent more than $60 million to fill three subsidized apartments with homeless Angelenos.
Meanwhile, City Hall still pumps hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars into the scandal-marred LA Homeless Services Authority –– despite years of talk about the need for change.
And that’s just the start.
Raman’s Time Limited Subsidy Program, set up in September, aimed to fill 2,000 apartments with homeless people, to get them off the streets. As of late last month, the program had filled just three units.
You can see where this is going.
The scheme is purportedly less expensive than Mayor Karen Bass’ signature Inside Safe program, which pays exorbitant rates to temporarily stash some of LA’s homeless –– who numbered 43,000 at last count –– in hotel rooms.
But not only has Raman’s initiative not been cost-effective; it hasn’t been effective at all.
And then there’s the city’s dismal record with the LA Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA).
Even as Bass appoints five of the 10 members who govern the authority (with LA County selecting the remainder), the city has appeared powerless to fix the agency ––........
