High-speed rail isn’t California’s only train to nowhere

Ca Post Editorial Board

New York Post

0
25.02.2026

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Business Personal Finance

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

High-speed rail isn’t California’s only train to nowhere

Gavin Newsom’s widely-mocked high-speed rail isn’t the only “train to nowhere” in California. In fact, the Golden State is a virtual graveyard of near-empty “ghost” trains and buses.

That hasn’t stopped an aggressive push for more federal dollars for public transit dollars in California, as Congress prepares a new five-year surface transportation bill, with billions of dollars more slated for urban transit programs.

Nearly every special-interest group, from big-city mayors and regional planning agencies to construction firms, transit unions, and even the Chamber of Commerce, is lobbying for more transit funding.

Yet the evidence shows clearly that decades of massive transit spending in California have not improved urban mobility.

A new Unleash Prosperity study examining the latest Census mobility data through 2024 finds that in nearly every major metro area in the country, public transit market share has dropped sharply even as spending has soared.

Adjusted for inflation, transit spending nationally is up nearly sixfold since 1960, but the percentage of commuters who actually ride buses and trains has fallen by roughly two-thirds.

California is no exception, despite spending more per capita on transit than almost any state. This is the very definition of negative efficiency.

The next time you see a bus or light-rail train pass by, notice how few passengers, if any, are aboard. Today, only about one out of every 25 commuters uses mass transit.

The latest fad among urban planners is the “15-minute city.” It’s a nice idea: a city in which public transit is just a short walk away.

But outside of very high-density urban cores, transit simply does not and cannot come close to achieving that goal.

Among the nation’s 50 largest metro areas, nearly 60 times more jobs are accessible by car within 30 minutes than by transit. That disparity is even greater in sprawling California metros.

Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedInCalifornia Post Sports Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, XCalifornia Post Opinion California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!California Post App: Download here!Home delivery: Sign up here!Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!

Meanwhile, Americans who drive alone still get to work in under 30 minutes on average, despite some of the nation’s highest gas taxes and congestion pricing proposals.

This is largely because a car, or even riding a bike or walking, will take you directly from your home to your workplace, door-to-door.

Buses, subways, and light rail almost never provide true point-to-point travel. In most cities, transit trips often require multiple transfers, long walks, and unreliable schedules, making them impractical for most working families.

The solution to improving mobility and shortening commutes in California is not to pour ever more money into costly transit systems, but rather to build and modernize roads and make them smarter.

For example, we could adopt light-change technology that moves the flow of traffic with fewer stops. Or we could use freeway management technology that reduces bottlenecks.

This is simple math. Nearly 20 times more Americans commute by car or work from home than use transit. More than three times as many people work from home as take buses or trains to work, a trend that has accelerated since the pandemic, and that shows no sign of reversing.

Those who lobby for public transportation continue to argue that more spending on buses and trains will reduce congestion and pollution. Many drivers even support public transit under the belief that it will get other commuters off the road.

That is an enduring myth. Transit ridership is now so small that it has virtually no measurable impact on traffic congestion in America’s metro areas.

As we move toward a future with increasingly low-cost, driverless Ubers and Lyfts, some cities are now experimenting with subsidizing these door-to-door rides and scrapping public transit altogether. This may soon be more cost-effective than putting low-income Americans on expensive and mostly empty buses, or subways with high operating costs.

Federal transportation dollars would be better spent improving and expanding road capacity rather than wasting more cash on 20th century “ghosts” that carry a steadily declining share of commuters.

Wendell Cox is a senior fellow at Unleash Prosperity in transportation policy. He served three terms on the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission.

public transportation

Trending Now on NYPost.com

This story has been shared 93,252 times. 93,252 North Carolina mom of three who vanished 24 years ago reveals why she ditched family

North Carolina mom of three who vanished 24 years ago reveals why she ditched family

This story has been shared 58,144 times. 58,144 Here are the US men’s hockey players skipping WH visit — and their reasons why

Here are the US men’s hockey players skipping WH visit — and their reasons why

This story has been shared 32,374 times. 32,374 Trump lauds military, lambasts heckling Dems, unveils new economic policies in record-setting SOTU address

Trump lauds military, lambasts heckling Dems, unveils new economic policies in record-setting SOTU address

visit website

Popular

High-speed rail isn’t California’s only train to nowhere

Ca Post Editorial Board

© New York Post