Oct 01, 2026 11:58 am IST

'Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics': On The Controversy Around India's GDP Growth Figures

The debate is less about a single figure than about a decade-long erosion of trust in official statistics.

Shashi Tharoor Shashi Tharoor MP, Columnist

Shashi Tharoor MP, Columnist

I am not an economist, so it was with some bemusement that I watched the debate surrounding India's economic growth figures spilling into the public square. When the government announced a headline-grabbing 7.8% real GDP growth rate for the first quarter (Q1) of 2026, the figure was met not with universal celebration, but with deep suspicion among independent economists, global financial institutions, and everyday citizens. It's clear that the debate is less about a single figure than about a decade-long erosion of trust in official statistics, and the stark mismatch between high-growth figures and the lived economic realities of ordinary Indians.

While the Q1 2026 data provided the spark, the underlying kindling has been dry for nearly ten years. Scepticism regarding India's official growth metrics is not a recent phenomenon. It can be traced back at least to the aftermath of the 2016 demonetisation policy and the subsequent rollout of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), then to the controversy over the Covid fatality numbers, the resignation of senior government statisticians, and now the eruption over GDP growth.

Over the past decade, eminent independent thinkers, including two who have worked with the BJP government, former Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian and former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan, have repeatedly raised red flags regarding how output is measured. Global bodies such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have similarly downgraded the credibility quotient of Indian data. This trust deficit was further deepened in 2024 when the government abruptly dissolved its advisory body of statisticians and academics, leaving official releases without the crucial stamp of independent oversight.

At the core of the current controversy lies a major recalculation: the transition from an older benchmark data series (base year 2011–12) to a new series (base........

© NDTV