FIRST READING: Everyone hates the Indian Act. So why does it refuse to die?
Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
FIRST READING: Everyone hates the Indian Act. So why does it refuse to die?
Progressives say it's racist, conservatives say it encourages government dependency
First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
FIRST READING: Everyone hates the Indian Act. So why does it refuse to die? Back to video
On Monday, following a summit between first ministers and First Nations leaders, Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew brandished his Indian status card in front of reporters, called it a “race-based form of identification” and appealed for the end of the law that made such a thing possible.
That would be the Indian Act. Passed into law 150 years ago, it sets out the basic legal frameworks under which First Nations exist in Canada: How band councils are elected, who qualifies as an “Indian,” and why reserve land can’t be sold or traded without Crown approval. Earlier iterations of the Act even barred Status Indians from voting in federal elections or possessing alcohol.
Columnist Jesse Kline keeps you up to date with what’s happening in Israel and the effects of antisemitism on life here in Canada. Friday mornings.
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Channel Israel will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Framers of the Indian Act at the time were open about its paternalistic goals, agreeing in House of Commons debates that Indians were “like children to a very great extent” who “required a great deal more protection than white men.”
Nowadays, it would be difficult to name a piece of Canadian federal legislation that is more disliked than the........
