menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Mia Hughes: Major U.S. medical groups take science-based approach to 'gender-affirming' care

17 5
15.02.2026

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Mia Hughes: Major U.S. medical groups take science-based approach to 'gender-affirming' care

Statements against such surgeries in youths are a welcome breath of fresh air

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Recently, two major American medical groups endorsed age restrictions on gender-related surgeries, marking a dramatic shift in a debate long dominated by claims of consensus. First, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) issued a policy statement firmly opposing “gender-affirming” surgeries for people under 19. Then, the American Medical Association (AMA) signalled its support. These pivots deal a significant blow to Canadian activists and politicians who rely on the supposed professional consensus to defend these highly contested, unproven treatments for youth.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

The ASPS, the professional association that represents the majority of plastic surgeons in the U.S. and Canada, now recommends that “surgeons delay gender-related breast/chest, genital, and facial surgery until a patient is at least 19 years old.” The group cites the numerous systematic reviews conducted in recent years that have all found only low to very low quality evidence to support these interventions. This development is highly relevant for Canada, given that national data confirms that these surgeries have already been performed on hundreds of minors.

Mia Hughes: Major U.S. medical groups take science-based approach to 'gender-affirming' care Back to video

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

After more than a decade of the field of pediatric gender medicine being guided by ideological narratives, the nine-page ASPS statement is a veritable breath of fresh air — a much-needed return to respect for evidence-based medicine, developmental science and the traditional ethical principles of beneficence (promoting health) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm). It’s a timely one, too, coming just days after a jury in New York State awarded a young woman $2 million in damages for a “gender-affirming” mastectomy performed on her as a teenager, which she said left her disfigured. Other malpractice cases of this kind are currently moving through U.S. courts.

Noting that the “natural course of pediatric gender dysphoria remains poorly understood,” with evidence suggesting that a “substantial portion” of young people who experience gender dysphoria will “experience resolution or significant reduction of distress by the time they reach adulthood, absent medical or surgical intervention,” the ASPS advises a “precautionary approach,” given the irreversible nature and known risks of “gender affirming” surgeries.

Mia Hughes: Child-transition activists will soon be proven wrong

Barbara Kay: Groundswell against gender-affirming care becoming too loud to ignore

Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

The policy statement also reaches beyond surgery, urging surgeons to “maintain a working understanding of the current limits of evidence regarding social transition, puberty suppression and cross-sex hormones.” In a field that involves a cascade of increasingly invasive interventions, this matters: research shows that social transitioning (a change of name and pronouns) commonly leads to puberty suppression, and puberty suppression in turn locks in gender distress, with most patients then progressing to cross-sex hormones.

Therefore, the ASPS reminds members that “diagnostic assessment, psychosocial support, endocrine intervention and surgery form a connected clinical pathway rather than a series of independent steps. Outcomes observed after surgery cannot be confidently attributed to surgery itself rather than to prior medical treatment, psychosocial factors or the natural trajectory of the condition. As a result, surgical interventions inherit the foundational uncertainties present earlier in the continuum of care.”

Canadian curlers accuse Sweden of improper filming in Olympic venue after cheating allegations Olympics

Canadian curlers accuse Sweden of improper filming in Olympic venue after cheating allegations

'Still a long road for my Maya moon': Tumbler Ridge survivor's mom says swelling going down Canada

'Still a long road for my Maya moon': Tumbler Ridge survivor's mom says swelling going down

Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Father of Tumbler Ridge shooter releases statement, addresses 'unforgivable act of violence' Canada

Father of Tumbler Ridge shooter releases statement, addresses 'unforgivable act of violence'

Canada-Sweden Olympic men's curling match erupts after cheating allegation as profanities fly Olympics

Canada-Sweden Olympic men's curling match erupts after cheating allegation as profanities fly

Team Homan lose three in a row in Olympic curling, add to Canada's double touch controversy Olympics

Team Homan lose three in a row in Olympic curling, add to Canada's double touch controversy

Importantly, the ASPS statement draws a sharp distinction between breast reduction or gynecomastia surgery (to reduce enlarged male breast tissue), which treat physical conditions, and “gender-affirming” mastectomies or breast implants, which rest on predicting future identity and shifting “embodiment goals.”

It urges much greater caution for trans-identified youth, noting that genuine informed consent requires not just understanding a diagnosis and the surgical risks, but engaging in complex, long-term, identity-linked decision-making — precisely the domains still under “ongoing maturation” in adolescence.

The statement is also refreshingly clear on ethics. Traditionally, autonomy means a patient may accept or refuse appropriate treatment; in “gender-affirming care,” it has been warped to mean patients can request any treatment and doctors must comply. The ASPS statement explains how respect for autonomy does not mean that a patient can demand surgeries for which there is no favourable risk/benefit profile, “particularly in adolescent populations where decision-making capabilities are still developing.”

In a press release the day after the ASPS statement was published, the American Medical Association said that the evidence for “gender-affirming” surgeries for youth is “insufficient” and “the AMA agrees with ASPS that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood.” The AMA had previously supported such procedures for young people.

And with that, the flimsy consensus supporting pediatric gender medicine collapsed.

To be sure, this moment was long overdue. In 2024, the U.K.’s Cass report revealed that this supposed consensus had been manufactured by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health and the Endocrine Society, which created the illusion of scientific agreement, despite a total absence of credible evidence. Their guidelines were copied by medical associations around the world, triggering a deluge of policy statements endorsing this drastic treatment protocol for healthy youth. That tangled web of empty endorsements is now finally beginning to unravel.

Undoubtedly, this course correction will be difficult. Innocent young people have been, and continue to be, harmed because every major medical association abandoned scientific and ethical principles, instead allowing small activist committees to craft policy based on ideology rather than evidence. This resulted in a cascade of confusion, with governments, media, well-meaning citizens and, worst of all, parents of trans-identified youth trusting that the experts were relying on solid science when they were not.

The truth is that wilful blindness has always been the essential ingredient in this scandal. It can only continue as long as everyone agrees not to look too closely. Nowhere is that more evident than in Canada, where, aside from Alberta, the experiment marches on unabated. When Canadian medical associations finally find the courage to do what the ASPS has done and subject this protocol to genuine scientific scrutiny, there will be only one possible conclusion: it cannot be allowed to continue.

Mia Hughes specializes in researching pediatric gender medicine, psychiatric epidemics, social contagion and the intersection of trans rights and women’s rights. She is the author of “The WPATH Files,” a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and director of Genspect Canada.

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

How much vitamin D do Canadians really need? A nutritionist explains Miranda Popen, hormone nutritionist, answers common vitamin D questions 5 Comments 1 day ago Wellness

How much vitamin D do Canadians really need? A nutritionist explains

Miranda Popen, hormone nutritionist, answers common vitamin D questions

These are the 3 best beauty products we tried this week Beauty Buzz: The 3 best beauty products we tried this week from Benefit, Sephora and Burberry 1 day ago Fashion & Beauty

These are the 3 best beauty products we tried this week

Beauty Buzz: The 3 best beauty products we tried this week from Benefit, Sephora and Burberry

The ultimate guide to men's boxers Our favourite options out there, from affordable to fancy 1 day ago Fashion

The ultimate guide to men's boxers

Our favourite options out there, from affordable to fancy

Advertisement 3Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

I tried a budget-friendly kitchen design hack guaranteed to last a lifetime — here’s how it went Affordable luxury from a Canadian brand 2 days ago Buy Canadian

I tried a budget-friendly kitchen design hack guaranteed to last a lifetime — here’s how it went

Affordable luxury from a Canadian brand

These Canadian hotels were just listed among the best in the world for 2026 Forbes Travel Guide recognizes 28 hotels across the country in this year's Star Awards 2 days ago Travel

These Canadian hotels were just listed among the best in the world for 2026

Forbes Travel Guide recognizes 28 hotels across the country in this year's Star Awards


© National Post