LeBron, Gaza, and the Cost of “Nothing but Great Things”
It takes a special kind of sentence to stain a legacy. LeBron James found one: “I’ve heard nothing but great things” about Israel — uttered while Gaza burns, while civilian bodies are counted in the tens of thousands, while entire neighbourhoods have been erased and families are digging loved ones from rubble. “Nothing but great things.” That is not ignorance. That is moral anaesthesia.
For more than a decade, LeBron insisted that silence is complicity. He scolded America when it deserved scolding. He condemned Trump. He wore Black Lives Matter on his chest. He made it clear that he was not just a basketball player but a citizen with a conscience. He rejected “shut up and dribble.” He told the world that greatness demands courage. Fine. But courage is not a domestic product.
When the violence moved beyond U.S. borders — when Gaza became a graveyard broadcast in real time — the volume dropped. Then, worse than silence, came praise. Not cautious language. Not a plea for peace. Praise. “Nothing but great things.” That phrase lands like applause at a funeral.
No one is asking LeBron to deliver a graduate seminar in Middle East history. The question is simpler: how does a self-declared champion of the oppressed offer unqualified admiration to a state conducting one of the most devastating military campaigns of the 21st century?
No one is asking LeBron to deliver a graduate seminar in Middle East history. The question is simpler: how does a self-declared champion of the oppressed offer unqualified admiration to a state conducting one of the most devastating military campaigns of the 21st century?
This is not a matter of “complexity.” It is a matter of clarity. Children under rubble are not complex. Bombed hospitals are not nuanced.
The GOAT debate ends here — not because politics should decide basketball, but because LeBron insisted that morality is part of greatness. You cannot demand to be measured like Muhammad Ali and then flinch when sacrifice is required. Ali’s legend rests not only on jabs and footwork but on the willingness to lose everything for what he believed. LeBron wants the halo without the heat.
His activism has been loud when safe and cautious when costly.
Speaking against racism in America carried risk, yes — but it also aligned with league messaging and corporate branding. Speaking forcefully against Israeli state violence would risk sponsors, partnerships, global markets. And so we get “nothing but great things.”
Speaking against racism in America carried risk, yes — but it also aligned with league messaging and corporate branding. Speaking forcefully against Israeli state violence would risk sponsors, partnerships, global markets. And so we get “nothing but great things.”
READ: UN raises alarm over risk of ethnic cleansing in Gaza and West Bank
Imagine the moral equivalent. Imagine a celebrity in 1855 saying he had heard “nothing but great things” about the plantations. Imagine a superstar in 1955 praising segregation for its “order.” The issue is not historical equivalence; it is moral blindness — complimenting the powerful while the powerless are crushed beneath them. And LeBron is not alone in this elegant cowardice.
Stephen Curry’s reported venture-capital ties to Israeli tech companies raise an obvious question: when your money touches an ecosystem deeply tied to military and surveillance systems, are you really neutral? Money is real. Where you invest it helps build real systems in the real world. Investment is not innocent. Divestment would cost him nothing compared to what civilians are paying. If silence is complicity, profit can be too.
Then there is Steve Kerr. His father, Malcolm Kerr, was assassinated in Beirut while serving as president of the American University of Beirut. Kerr understands political violence in the most personal way imaginable. That should make him exquisitely sensitive to every family shattered by bombs and bullets. Instead, there is restraint. Caution. Silence. Some argue that because Kerr’s father was assassinated in the Middle East, he must “understand” Israel’s security posture.
But let’s be clear about something uncomfortable: if we are talking about assassination as a tactic, Israel has turned it into a refined instrument of statecraft. Decades of targeted killings — scientists, leaders, officials — carried out across borders with precision and frequency.
Drone strikes. Covert operations. Car bombs. Snipers. The record is long and publicly acknowledged. If assassination has a world champion in modern geopolitics, Israel is in the finals every year. So the framing that Kerr should instinctively sympathize with Israel because of assassination misses the point. If anything, his personal tragedy should make him recoil at the normalization of state-sanctioned killing, not fall silent before it.
The NBA loves to market itself as progressive. Slogans on courts. Statements before games. Social justice packaged between commercials. But justice is not a limited-time promotion. It either applies universally or it becomes merchandise.
LeBron James will retire as one of the most gifted athletes ever to touch a basketball. That is secure. But moral greatness is not measured in championships. It is measured in whether principles survive contact with power. He once said silence is complicity. He was right. And history has a longer memory than any scoreboard.
When the lights fade and the banners hang, it will not ask how high he jumped — only where he stood.
OPINION: The final solution to Imran Khan
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
