When privilege echoed, defending a hike in electricity tariffs suggesting that citizens simply eat less mutton to balance their household budgets, the reaction was swift, visceral, and laced with dark familiarity. On the surface, the remark was a clumsy attempt at household fiscal arithmetic, an administrative calculation measuring dietary expenditure against utility bills. Beneath it lay a timeless socio-political phenomenon of the profound, structural alienation of an entrenched privileged class from the everyday reality of the people.

This argument is not an isolated slip of a privileged tongue. It is an artefact of an elite posture where privilege masquerades as prudence; structural failures are offloaded onto private morality, and the working masses are treated not as citizens with collective rights, but as undisciplined subjects in need of austerity. To understand why such remarks ignite deep resentment, one must look past the immediate arithmetic of wattage, smartphone data, and mutton kilos, and probe into the intersection of privileged paternalism, the anthropological construction of class hierarchy, and the historical memory of governance across societies.

In his landmark critique of statecraft, “Seeing Like a State” anthropologist James C. Scott observed that modern administrative apparatuses simplify complex, lived human realities into legible, quantifiable metrics such as kilowatt-hours, revenue collection efficiencies, and per-capita caloric counts. To the technocrat sitting in an insulated, climate-controlled space with a guaranteed state pension and subsidized amenities, a rise in utility tariffs is merely a rational pricing correction. When the lived reality of the populace resists this abstraction; when artisans, daily wagers, farmers, and small shopkeepers express anguish over rising living costs in a harsh Himalayan climate, the technocratic mind experiences cognitive dissonance. Instead of re-evaluating structural inefficiencies, transmission losses, corporate resource extraction, or historical fiscal inequities, the elite mind seeks a behavioural defect in the governed.

The argument that people spend heavily on meat or frivolous........

© Greater Kashmir