There is a seduction in tidiness. A country of 1.4 billion people, holding some election or the other in almost every season, does look, on paper, like an administrative embarrassment — a nation perpetually interrupted by its own democracy. “One Nation, One Election” (ONOE) offers the promise of an India that votes once, governs for five years, and gets on with the business of being a serious, orderly power. It is a seductive picture. It is also, I would argue, a fundamentally mistaken one — mistaken not in its arithmetic but in its understanding of what elections are for in a democratic life.Democracies do not hold frequent, staggered elections because they are disorganised. They hold them because the staggering is the safeguard. To collapse every electoral calendar in a continental, plural, federal country into a single five-year heartbeat is to mistake the rhythm of democracy for its inefficiency, and to risk trading away the very asynchrony that keeps power accountable, minorities visible, and regions audible.

The wisdom of the staggerConsider a document Indians rarely invoke in this debate: the American constitutional design of 1787. The framers of the US Constitution could easily have made every part of the federal government turn over at once. They chose not to. The Senate was deliberately built so that only a third of its members face election every two years, while the House is entirely renewed and the presidency follows its own separate cycle. James Madison, defending this design in the Federalist Papers, argued that a body wholly refreshed all at once was dangerously exposed to “every sudden breeze of passion” — that a nation needed some institutions to change gradually, precisely so the whole government could not be swept in a single direction by a single mood, however genuine that mood might be.

That is a strikingly unfashionable idea in our present moment, but it is a sound one: a republic is healthier when its constituent elections do not all answer to the same question, asked on the same day, under the same emotional weather. Manufactured synchrony does not create political maturity; it creates political monopoly for whichever wave happens to be cresting on polling day.

France offers the opposite lesson, and a cautionary one. In 2000, the French republic altered its presidential term from seven years to five and aligned........

© Greater Kashmir