menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

JONATHAN TURLEY: Justice Jackson just showed why Democrats are desperate to pack the Supreme Court

14 0
05.05.2026

Opinion

JONATHAN TURLEY: Justice Jackson just showed why Democrats are desperate to pack the Supreme Court

Jackson's sole dissent in Louisiana v. Callais drew rebukes from Justices Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch

By Jonathan Turley Fox News

Published May 5, 2026 3:32pm EDT | Updated May 5, 2026 3:35pm EDT

Facebook Twitter Threads Flipboard Comments Print Email Add Fox News on Google

close

Video

Democrats decry Supreme Court ruling that rolls back key provision of voting rights act

Fox News chief legal correspondent Shannon Bream reports on the Supreme Court decision that limits the use of race in congressional redistricting on ‘Special Report.’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Since her appointment by President Joe Biden, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has quickly developed a radical and chilling jurisprudence. Her frequent sole dissents and accusatory rhetoric have drawn not just the ire of her conservative colleagues but also that of her liberal colleagues. This week, that tension deepened with a stinging rebuke from Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

At issue is the finalization of the court’s opinion in Louisiana v. Callais, where the court ruled 6-3 to bar racial gerrymandering. The court reaffirmed the use of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to ban intentional racial discrimination in the design of voting districts but effectively found many districts to be unconstitutional in their current form.

There is no reason why the decision should not be finalized except for a blatantly partisan effort to protect Democrats from losing seats in the midterm elections. After all, if these districts are unconstitutional, why shouldn’t states guarantee that voters are given representatives chosen free of racially discriminatory preferences?

That question is even more confusing given the long wait for this opinion. Not only was the case reargued, but there were growing complaints about the delay in releasing the opinion.

MEDIA OUTRAGE OVER SUPREME COURT’S VOTING RIGHTS ACT DECISION COLLIDES WITH REALITY

Complaints increased after a recent book allegedly reported that Justice Elena Kagan........

© Fox News