A War With Zero Distance From Bangladesh – OpEd
The distance between the Golan Heights and a kitchen in Dhaka’s Mirpur is exactly zero. In a globalized economy, geography is a myth. As Brent crude oil prices spiked to $119.50 per barrel this week (March 9, 2026), following a series of missile exchanges between Iran and Israel, the geopolitical premium became an abstract concept no longer for Bangladeshi policymakers. It became a direct tax on the dinner table. For a country undergoing a delicate transition and formally seeking to extend its LDC preparatory period until 2029, this Middle Eastern escalation is not just a foreign policy challenge; it is a macroeconomic emergency.
The math for Bangladesh is brutal. Recent statistics from the Policy Research Institute (PRI) show that each $10 rise in the price of a barrel of oil costs the country about $900 million in annual energy import costs. The Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) is faced with a giant fiscal hole as oil has shot up almost three-quarters of its pre-conflict $75 to almost $120 in a matter of days. If the government passes these costs to the consumer, transport and irrigation costs will skyrocket, further fueling a food inflation rate that already hit 9.13% in February 2026. Alternatively, the government could absorb these costs through subsidies, but this would likely breach the fiscal discipline required by the $4.7 billion IMF program. Such a move would be directly opposed to IMF requirements, which clearly demand that the subsidization of energy be reduced and rationalized. Fiscal generosity has little room when the debt-to-GDP ratio of a country is expected to go up to 41.7% by FY27.
It is not just about the price of fuel; it is about the path it takes. The Strait of Hormuz processes about 20 percent of the world’s oil and much of the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) in the world. This serves as the lifeblood of Bangladesh’s energy security, as the country relies on this maritime artery to facilitate its critical Sale and Purchase Agreements (SPA) with QatarEnergy and OQ of Oman. Though the country is relying on these long-term contracts to smooth its energy basket, the more physical danger to the strait has shot insurance premiums on shipping containers into the stratosphere. Even though the Iranian officials have given diplomatic guarantees that no Bangladeshi tankers would be attacked or blocked, the short-term impact is an acute price increase due to the perception of a risk and the skyrocketing of maritime logistics.
In the case of the Ready-Made Garments industry, which is the main source of foreign exchange in Bangladesh, this is a two-edged sword. To start with, the imported raw materials like dyes, chemicals, and special fabrics become expensive because of increased freight expenses and the geopolitical premium applied to each shipment. Second, major markets in the United States and the European Union are weakening, and these constitute the company’s two primary export destinations, alongside two additional countries currently grappling with energy-driven inflation. The financial relationship is direct and adaptable. When a customer in Berlin is made to pay a higher rate for heating their house, they will be bound to purchase one fewer T-shirt in a factory in Gazipur.
The most visceral impact, however, is on food. The food inflation in Bangladesh is growing steadily, and the Middle East war can only aggravate this. Modern agriculture is fundamentally dependent on fossil fuels, meaning that any rise in global energy prices translates directly into higher costs of producing calories. The cost of irrigation will also be increased due to the increased oil price, since most pumps used in Bangladesh run on diesel. The pressure on fertilizers is also increasing as the world’s natural gas price roughly went up by 4.6 percent this week. Gas is the most important feedstock for urea, and hence, the cost of farming is driving towards a cliff. Moreover, the leaks in the logistics make sure that every kilometer traveled by a truck transporting goods between the northern farm-belts and Dhaka is now more expensive, and these prices never get taken up by the middleman; rather, they are delivered to the urban poor directly.
Bangladesh Bank is now in a dilemma that economists refer to as the Impossible Trinity. Bangladesh has gross foreign exchange reserves of $34.10 billion (by BPM6 standards, $29.38 billion) as of March 8, 2026. Although this is an improvement on the lows of 2024, a long-term war in the Middle East would make such reserves exhausted to finance the needs of necessity imports of energy. The higher interest rates may be maintained by the central bank to protect the Taka and limit the imported inflation. But higher interest rates will kill the personal sector investment required to achieve 4.8 percent GDP growth in FY26. The policymakers are in a way opting for either a currency crisis, a growth recession, or an inflation riot.
Reality is, Bangladesh can no longer afford to be a price taker in a world of permanent volatility. It requires three instant changes in order to defend the Bangladeshi kitchen. The former is the diversification of energy. The Strait of Hormuz threat is a screaming alarm that it should switch to renewable energy and domestically explore gas that is not imported. Dependence on the spot market for LNG is a formula to fiscal instability. Secondly, it has to set buffer stocks and needs to take advantage of the relatively calm periods to develop strategic petroleum and food reserves that can absorb the 30-day shocks of geopolitical flares. And lastly is the social safety net precision. The government should cease the broad subsidies in favor of targeted cash transfer since the real wages of the bottom 40 have been cut away by inflation. The case of the US-Israel conflict with Iran reminds the Bangladesh government that national security is not only about the border guards but also the cost of a liter of soybean oil and a bag of rice. Unless it sorts out the economy of the kitchen, there will be no stability that can be salvaged by any geopolitical maneuvering. Wait-and-see policy is a luxury that its citizens wore themselves out on long ago.
