The state visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Israel on 2526 February 2026 is a new milestone in the bilateral relations, but it occurs within the circumstances of increasing tensions in the relations between Washington and Tehran and the ongoing war in Gaza. Modi was the first Indian prime minister to speak in the Israeli parliament (the Knesset), a symbolic move that marked the further orientation between New Delhi and Tel Aviv.

The foreign policy of India over the decades has been a balanced stance in the Middle East, which, at the same time, has been friendly to Israel, but at the same time, the foreign policy is publicly in favor of the Palestinian state. However, the fact that this visit happened at a time when the U.S. exerted greater pressure on Iran and its regional allies raises the geopolitical stakes. Tehran is also skeptical about the expansion of strategic relations which implicitly approve the isolation of Iran, and the high-profile relations of India with Israel weaken the role of New Delhi as a neutral interlocutor in West Asia.

India and Iran have also had economic and strategic interests such as the assistance of India in the project of Chabahar port in southeastern Iran and the traditionally friendly relations before the sanctions regimes. The intensification India-Israel relations changes the diplomatic balance in a manner that will be perceived by Tehran to be negative to its own regional security calculus, and create greater contestation in diplomatic forums and proxy play.

India’s New‑Found Overt Partnership and Implications for Middle East

The foreign policy of India is changing at a fast rate. Based initially on a multilateral foreign policy that was aimed at involving both the Western and non-aligned blocs, New Delhi under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi has embarked on a diversified strategic portfolio consisting of improved collaboration with both the major powers and the regional actors. The relationship between India and Israel, which was officially launched in 1992, has undergone evolution of an under-the-carpet diplomatic security alliance to an overt alliance on the strategic arena. Israeli weaponry and technology are now a major pillar in the defence acquisition and co-production system of India. In addition, to defence, economic talks, such as potential free trade agreements and technology cooperation, are also taking a place at the centre of the list.

On the outside, this open aggressiveness changes the attitudes towards the geopolitical power of India. The partnership between India and Israel is an indication to the Middle East and other nations that New Delhi is ready to engage in strategic alliances that are consistent with its interests despite them seeming to conflict with its past balancing operations. As a result, alignments in the Middle East are also being re-calibrated forcing states in Gulf cooperation councils, Tehran and Ankara to re-evaluate the role of the India in fault lines in the region.

Conceptualizing India as a threat to the Middle East is a simplification of a more complicated reality. The strategic aspirations of India currently do not include the control of the territory or ideological superiority in West Asia; on the contrary, New Delhi wants to have a steady stream of energy, the collaboration of technologies, and the possibility to influence geopolitics.

However, the growing relations between India and Israel, especially in the defence area and sharing of intelligence, are viewed by certain Middle Eastern players, especially Iran, as a move to identify India with a group that might be hostile to their regional interests. The plans like the so-called hexagon alliance framework, which Israeli leadership publicly said it wanted India to join the alliance of partners against the radical axes, are crystallisation of these anxieties. In that regard, the role of India is not necessarily intimidating in a conventional security meaning, but an increasing interdependence between India and Israel and Western security allies changes the balance of interests in the region. These changes can trigger new orientations or further the levels of competition, especially in places where Iran and its supporters believe that its strategic space is shrinking.

Critics believe India is being too open in its alliance with Israel to the detriment of its long-time diplomatic protectionism and is implicitly endorsing controversial areas of Israeli politics. Owing to the cautious public diplomacy that promotes peace without directly criticizing Israeli actions in Gaza, Modi is tactically more closely aligned, which can be viewed as implicit support of the Israeli paradigm of security.

The increasing defence relationship and readiness of India towards a more prominent alliance with one of the key actors in the Middle Eastern conflict might be interpreted as an extension of the line of regional division, instead of a way to alleviate it. Mutual strategy narrative on which the Israeli and Indian leaders have marketed their alliance is that they are forming a bulwark against extremism- a strategy that runs the danger of solidifying geopolitical blocs.

The prospects of collective development of advanced defence technologies and intelligence exchange bring about concerns of Indian indirect participation in regional security arrangements that had long been dominated by the West. Just like it may be considered as the continuation of the chaos or a stabilization of deterrence, the increased role of India cannot but redefine geopolitics.

Impact on Indian Diaspora in the Middle East 

The Indian diaspora in the Middle East its over 10 million Indians living in the Gulf states alone and in large and significant numbers in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and Oman, are a key socio-economic interest group in terms of foreign-policy views. The economies of the Gulf and India are strongly tied by employment, remittances, and community ties. Due to this highly interconnectedness, the foreign-policy philosophy of New Delhi continues to focus on practical compromise throughout the relationships, especially in terms of energy security and labour mobility.

An erroneous foreign-policy policy that estranges strategic states in the Gulf or triggers counterbalancing groupings would place the wellbeing of the diaspora at risk. However, recent developments reveal that India is determined to maintain a broad level of relation with the Gulf monarchies and, at the same time, increase strategic partnership with Israel. Economic contributions of the diaspora, regardless of whether it is in terms of remittances or in terms of cultural and commercial connections, is a buffer and a measure of decision-makers. In turn, the general Middle-East policy of India seeks to avoid any open polarization that would threaten the interests of millions of expatriates.

© Eurasia Review