Trump’s Unreliability Dominates European Thinking — Despite European efforts to increase defense spending, Trump’s threats to withdraw troops, his loyalty demands, and his refusal to commit to Article 5 have forced Europe to seriously plan for a NATO with significantly less (or no) US involvement.

Europe Faces a Massive Defense Transformation — Building a credible European-led defense — replacing US assets in intelligence, air defense, nuclear umbrella, and more — while integrating with existing NATO structures is described as a colossal and extremely difficult task.

NATO’s Future is Uncertain — The alliance must prepare for hybrid threats from Russia and Iran while dealing with deep transatlantic distrust, shifting US priorities, and the challenge of creating a unified European military and political will.

In a book published last year called “If Russia Wins: A scenario,” German academic Carlo Masala presented a gloomy take on European defense and NATO in the Trump era. He speculated on how things could unfold if Vladimir Putin decided to test the alliance by rolling tanks into Narva, an Estonian town of 50,000 mostly Russian-speaking residents, close to the border with Russia.The hypothetical crisis is described as unfolding in the spring of 2028 after Ukraine is forced to concede territory when its Western support collapses. In the book, Moscow assures Washington that the invasion is limited and merely meant to protect Russian speakers in the region. Masala describes a US president not dissimilar to Donald Trump making one thing clear to his NATO allies: America will not risk a third world war to defend a small town in Estonia.Many experts consider the scenario nonsensical as, since 2022, NATO........

© Eurasia Review