The author says the old Gulf bet—that oil and gas would always find a way out—is broken: the Iran–Israel–U.S. war has made Hormuz, pipelines, ports, tankers, and bypasses all part of the same exposure. Pre-war Hormuz: ~20 million barrels a day (~a quarter of seaborne oil) plus heavy Qatari/UAE LNG use.

Saudi East–West to Yanbu (~4–5 million b/d, ~4–5% of world supply) was the map’s escape; after drone damage it was shut, so the Hormuz bypass became a target. Red Sea still funnels through Bab al-Mandeb; Houthi gains on Yemen’s coast are framed as a second jaw. LNG has even fewer detours (IEA: Qatar UAE ~20% of LNG through Hormuz). Asia (China, India, Japan, Korea) takes most of the oil.

Insurance and freight can squeeze markets before barrels vanish. U.S. force can escort and defend but cannot harden every lane. New pipes, ports, and rails take years; war does not. Immediate task: navigation; long task: a geography no single strait can choke.

For decades, the Gulf’s energy system rested on a simple assumption: oil and gas could always find a route to global markets. That assumption is now being tested.

The war involving Iran, Israel and the United States has transformed the Gulf from a relatively predictable energy corridor into a network of exposed strategic targets. The danger is no longer limited to the Strait of Hormuz. Pipelines, ports, tankers and alternative maritime routes are also becoming part of the conflict. The result is a difficult reality. There is no completely safe route out of the Middle East energy crisis.

The Strait of Hormuz remains the central vulnerability. Before the current war, roughly 20 million barrels of oil and petroleum products crossed it every day. That represented about a quarter of global seaborne oil trade. Qatar and the UAE also depend heavily on the strait for LNG exports.

But the crisis has now demonstrated that........

© Eurasia Review