After Iranian/Houthi hits earlier in 2026 on Jazan, Abha, and Khamis Mushait, Riyadh signed the Mecca Pact with Turkey and Pakistan on 7 August (attack on one = attack on all). New Houthi strikes on energy and Red Sea sites came days later. Saudi’s “we will not tolerate attacks on our energy infrastructure” is framed as the pact’s first live test. The deal has no automatic troops, joint command, or prepositioned forces—deterrence only if Ankara and Islamabad treat Saudi hits as collective.

Pakistan is called the weak link: no visible reply to the latest barrage, a record of hedging (Afghanistan, selective CT), and a risk of drawing in U.S./Israeli suspicion over nuclear signalling. Turkey’s value is industry and scale; Saudi Arabia’s is money and geography. Silence from Islamabad, the author says, already undercuts “one for all.”

Stakes: Brent near $98, Gulf energy as a global stabilizer, and whether a Sunni bloc can stand without U.S. guarantees. If partners share intel, air defence, or even token forces, the pact becomes real; if they treat it as Riyadh’s private war, it stays paper. The author’s earlier line still stands: it may prove a costly illusion. Coming weeks decide.

Saudi Arabia’s latest warning to the Houthis,“We will not tolerate attacks on our energy infrastructure”, is more than a familiar expression of outrage. It is the first real-world stress test of the Mecca Trilateral Strategic Agreement, Riyadh’s newly minted defense pact with Turkey and Pakistan. And as I argued in my earlier Eurasia Review oped, “The Mecca Pact: Saudi Arabia’s Gamble on Deterrence,” the pact’s credibility hinges on the reliability of its partners, especially Pakistan, the most strategically ambiguous actor in the trio.

The Mecca Agreement was signed on August 7, 2026, at a moment, when........

© Eurasia Review