menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Review – Resilient Statehood

46 0
22.07.2026

Resilient Statehood: Why and How Some Nations Maintained Long-Term Independence and SovereigntyBy Logan Cochrane and Alexandra WilsonSpringer, 2026

For centuries, historians have been fascinated by empires. We know why Britain expanded, how France consolidated its colonial possessions, and why European powers came to dominate much of the globe. Far less attention has been paid to the opposite question: why did some states remain independent? Resilient Statehood, edited by Logan Cochrane and Alexandra Wilson (2026), begins precisely where much of the literature ends. By shifting attention from the conquerors to those who resisted conquest, the editors make a deceptively simple yet intellectually significant contribution. They invite readers to reconsider sovereignty not as an accident of history, but as an achievement.

The volume examines six historical cases including Japan, Thailand, Bhutan, Afghanistan, Iran, and Ethiopia. It concludes with a comparative framework drawing additional insights from Nepal and Mongolia. The objective is not simply to explain why these countries escaped colonization, but to identify broader patterns that help explain resilient statehood across different historical and geopolitical contexts. The selection of cases is well justified, yet it inevitably raises questions regarding omission. Countries such as Korea, Liberia, or other partially autonomous polities receive only limited attention despite presenting potentially informative counterfactuals. Although the editors acknowledge many of these complexities, the boundaries of what constitutes a “resilient state” remain open to debate and invite further comparative research.

The editors deserve considerable credit for resisting deterministic explanations. Nevertheless, the emphasis on political agency occasionally risks underplaying structural international constraints. In several chapters, the balance between domestic leadership and external geopolitical opportunity could have been explored in greater analytical depth. Geography, for example, appears throughout the book, yet the contributors repeatedly demonstrate that geography alone explains remarkably little. Mountains do not preserve sovereignty; political leadership determines whether mountains become strategic assets or insurmountable obstacles. Bhutan illustrates this particularly well. Likewise, Japan’s experience shows that resilience emerged not from isolation itself but from selective engagement with external powers, adopting foreign knowledge where beneficial while maintaining political autonomy. Similar patterns appear........

© E-International