F-35 in flight. Photo: US Air Force.

What the United States is signaling in Venezuela is not merely a dispute over one government, one election, or one leader. It is a warning to the world that international law—already fragile, already selectively enforced—has now been openly pushed aside. And this warning comes from a man who presents himself as a global peacemaker, a would-be Nobel laureate, a self-styled dealmaker who claims to have “ended” nearly twenty wars that exist largely in his own imagination.

The contradiction is not incidental. It is the point.

Under Donald Trump, the United States has not merely returned to coercive foreign policy; it has hyper-normalised it. Practices once associated with rogue states—economic strangulation, collective punishment, political blacklisting—have been repackaged as routine tools of diplomacy. Sanctions are no longer instruments of last resort; they are weapons deployed reflexively, indiscriminately, and punitively.

European Union officials have been sanctioned for the offence of disagreement. International human rights advocates have seen their insurance canceled and their travel restricted after criticizing U.S. policy. Palestinian officials have been barred from entering the United States altogether. These are not measures aimed at resolving conflict or protecting civilians. They are warnings—meant to intimidate, isolate, and silence.

On the other hand, European NATO members are trapped in a relationship they refuse to name. Security is outsourced upward; responsibility is displaced outward. When Washington acts illegally, allies are expected to align—or at least not resist. This is not collective defence. It is asymmetric dependence.The has resulted is moral paralysis.

The threat to forcibly remove—or effectively kidnap—a foreign head of state crosses an even darker........

© CounterPunch