The Most Sacred Place in America? The Voting Booth
When asked to name America’s most sacred place, what comes to mind?
Perhaps the 9/11 Memorial, where grief and resilience coexist in quiet reflection. Or Arlington National Cemetery’s Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, honoring sacrifice beyond name or rank. For some, sacredness is rooted in heritage. The Black Hills of South Dakota, revered by the Sioux Nation. Seattle's Sakya Monastery. Newport's Touro Synagogue (the nation's first). The Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in Washington, DC, or perhaps a bar in New York City called Stonewall, where a marginalized group refused to remain invisible.
All are worthy answers.
But for me, the most sacred place in America is far less grand, far less visible, and far more powerful.
This moment is not simply about policy differences. It is about how, and how well, our democratic system functions at its core.
It is the voting booth.
I came to understand this not through theory, but through experience.
In 1971, just two weeks after my 18th birthday, the 26th Amendment was ratified, granting 18-year-olds the right to vote. My generation had watched young men drafted into the Vietnam War, sent to fight and die, without having a voice in the democracy they were asked to defend.
That changed overnight.
I was among the first to step into that new reality.
My first voting booth was simple, a small curtained space with metal levers and switches. As I pulled the close-curtain lever, it made a unique sound, punctuating a sense of autonomy, privacy, freedom, personal power, and my passage into responsible adulthood.
That moment has stayed with me ever since.
Today, as we approach another pivotal election, that sacred space feels more important, and more fragile, than ever.
The six-month countdown to the midterms has begun.
This election carries a different kind of weight. In recent years, the balance of power that defines our system of government has shown visible strain. A legislative branch often mired in gridlock has struggled to provide consistent oversight of the executive. At the same time, a Supreme Court reshaped by a series of deeply consequential appointments has issued rulings that revisit and, in some cases, reverse long-settled precedents, altering the landscape of rights and federal authority. Layer onto that ongoing disputes over election integrity and the certification of results, and it becomes clear that this moment is not simply about policy differences. It is about how, and how well, our democratic system functions at its core.
Across the country, we are witnessing debates and decisions that directly affect who can vote, how they vote, and whether those votes are counted without interference. In some states, new legislation has shortened early voting periods, limited the use........
