Every time the situation between the United States and Iran flares, the public conversation collapses into the same predictable imagery: grainy drone footage, dramatic explosions, and breathless commentary about "the brink." It's theatre. It paints a picture of villainy and heroism. And while it might hold attention, it doesn't hold water. It certainly doesn't help the people who actually want clarity, including the young Australians - like my son - weighing up a future in Defence, trying to understand what they may be stepping into.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Login or signup to continue reading

As is usually the case, the reality is far less cinematic and far more human.

The US-Iran relationship isn't a story of good versus evil. It's a story of two nations locked in a long, exhausting feedback loop of fear - each convinced it is acting defensively, each interpreting the other's defensive behaviour as aggression. If we want to understand what's happening now, we have to start there.

The roots of this loop go back to 1953, when the CIA helped overthrow Iran's elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, after he nationalised the country's oil industry. For Iranians, this wasn't a geopolitical manoeuvre; it was a national trauma. It taught them that foreign powers, especially the United States, would intervene decisively when their interests were threatened. When the Islamic Revolution toppled the US-backed shah in 1979, the new government defined itself in opposition to that history. The hostage crisis that followed cemented the United States as Iran's primary adversary.

This is what happens when one world power assumes the role of international policeman

Assassination shouldn't become the new normal

Albanese's standards will be his legacy, but will define us as well

From the American perspective, the revolution replaced a cooperative US ally with a government that rejected Western influence and supported armed groups across the Middle East. Iran's nuclear program, missile development, and regional alliances have reinforced Washington's belief that Tehran is destabilising and expansionist. Meanwhile, Iran sees US sanctions, military bases, and targeted killings as proof that Washington's ultimate goal is regime change.

Both sides believe they are responding to danger. Both sides believe the other is the aggressor. And both sides can point to real events that justify their fears.

This is the part we rarely talk about. When the US imposes sanctions, it sees pressure; Iran sees economic warfare. When Iran arms militias, it sees deterrence; the US sees terrorism. When the US builds bases across the region, it sees stability; Iran sees encirclement. When Iran expands its nuclear program, it sees leverage; the US sees a looming threat.

Each side's "defensive" actions make the other side's worst fears feel justified. That is the machinery driving the conflict - not ideology, not destiny, not some inevitable clash of civilisations. Fear. History. Misinterpretation. And the very human instinct to protect one's own - and also to have what someone else has: in this case, oil.

Oil was the foundation of early US-Iran cooperation dating back to the early 1900s. It was the trigger for the 1953 coup. It was a driver of resentment and revolution under the US-backed shah's regime as Iranians saw their national resources flowing externally. It fed the revolutionary sentiment that exploded in 1979, becoming a symbol of sovereignty. And it is a weapon in the modern conflict via sanctions, oil market fluctuations and energy security. It has become more than a resource: it's a geopolitical tool.

Breaking this cycle of fear requires acknowledging that neither side holds the moral high ground, and neither side is entirely wrong. That's uncomfortable, but it's the only starting point that leads anywhere useful. Any meaningful de-escalation must address the core fears on both sides: Iran's fear of regime change and permanent economic isolation, and the United States' fear of a nuclear-armed Iran with expanding regional influence, and gatekeeping powers over key global oil reserves.

Diplomacy here is slow, unglamorous and complex work. It looks like verifiable limits on nuclear activity, regional security agreements, and phased sanctions relief tied to compliance. It looks like involving regional actors, not just Washington and Tehran, in setting rules around missiles, shipping lanes, and non-state armed groups. And it looks like creating political space in both countries for compromise to be seen as strength rather than surrender.

The real story is not the explosions. It's the machinery of fear that keeps producing them. And if we want a safer world for the next generation, whether they serve in uniform or not, we need to start talking about that machinery with clarity, not spectacle.

Zoë Wundenberg is a careers consultant and un/employment advocate at impressability.com.au. She is a volunteer with the Voices of Farrer.

The US and Iran are stuck in feedback loop of fear - this is where it began

War-trapped Aussies heading home on first Dubai flight

'Show must go on': host addresses Kyle, Jackie O split

What an end: how a final Qantas flight's passengers ended up on a bus instead

'Public execution', vile abuse in PM threats sparked national security raid

Blood moon wows in final appearance for three years

Today's top stories curated by our news team. Also includes evening update.

Don't miss updates on news about the Public Service.

Grab a quick bite of today's latest news from around the region and the nation.

Catch up on the news of the day and unwind with great reading for your evening.

Get the editor's insights: what's happening & why it matters.

Stay in the know on news that matters to you with twice weekly newsletters from The Senior.

Going out or staying in? Find out what's on.

The latest news, results & expert analysis.

Early Look At David Pope

Your exclusive preview of David Pope's latest cartoon.

Join our weekly poll for Canberra Times readers.

We've selected the best reading for your weekend.

Get the latest property and development news here.

Every Saturday and Tuesday, explore destinations deals, tips & travel writing to transport you around the globe.

Sharp. Close to the ground. Digging deep. Your weekday morning newsletter on national affairs, politics and more.

Your essential national news digest: all the big issues on Wednesday and great reading every Saturday.

Get the very best journalism from The Canberra Times by signing up to our special reports.

Voice of Real Australia

Get real, Australia! Let the ACM network's editors and journalists bring you news and views from all over.

Get news, reviews and expert insights every Thursday from CarGuide, ACM's exclusive motoring partner.

Be the first to know when news breaks.

Your digital replica of Today's Paper. Ready to read from 5am!

Your favourite puzzles

Test your skills with interactive crosswords, sudoku & trivia. Fresh daily!

© Canberra Times