During the Mahmoud v. Taylor oral arguments in front of the Supreme Court this week, universal school choice was lauded by none other than Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Of course, Jackson did not intend to do this.

Jackson said she was “struggling to see how it burdens a parent’s religious exercise if the school teaches something the parent disagrees with. You don’t have to send your kid to that school. You can put them in another situation.” What a powerful, albeit inadvertent, endorsement for school choice.

Supreme Court justices and Democratic Party voters alike wonder why Maryland parents don’t just move along. After all, there are other schools, right? But universal school choice does not exist in the state. In fact, most of the country lacks universal school choice. Many families do not have the financial resources to send their children to private or religious schools. Many do not have the time and resources to........

© Washington Examiner