"America was built by immigrants.”

“They’re just our neighbors.”

These slogans are political shields. They turn legitimate questions about immigration policy into accusations of racism and cruelty, while the officials responsible for the consequences escape accountability. They ask Americans to judge policies by their stated intentions, not by their results.

America’s immigrant heritage is not a license to abandon the rule of law. Honoring lawful, orderly immigration does not require accepting disorderly, unlawful entry. Compassion does not mean suspending judgment, and a slogan is no substitute for sound policy.

My parents understood that. They came to America believing in its promise of law, order, fairness, and opportunity. They did not presume their hardships entitled them to special privileges or permission to bypass the rules. They waited their turn, asked permission, and entered through the front door. They came prepared to work and build a life, not expecting government benefits.

Why should their respect for the law count for less than a politician’s demand that we overlook its violation?

Since when does compassion overrule the law? The law applies to everyone, not just those whose circumstances make them politically convenient to defend. Yet this selective compassion often follows a familiar formula: identify a group labeled vulnerable or oppressed, cast it as the victim, and portray enforcing the law as an act of cruelty. Compassion then becomes political currency. It earns politicians moral approval, allows them to cast themselves as the good guys, and gives them cover to override the law while claiming the moral high ground. The deeper the inversion, the more easily the consequences are dismissed. The law is for everyone. This brand of political compassion is reserved for the select. That is not moral clarity. It is moral inversion.

The question is not........

© Townhall