menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

MANDEL: Could questions about a forensic psychiatrist win Alek Minassian a new trial?

18 0
11.02.2026

At a motion to be heard by Ontario's highest court, mass killer seeking "fresh evidence" from prosecutors about CAMH forensic psychiatrist Dr. Scott Woodside

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Toronto mass killer Alek Minassian is appealing his 10 murder convictions — and is banking on new controversy over a key Crown witness to deliver him a new trial.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Don't have an account? Create Account

How enraging that would be if that’s enough to thrust this merciless killer back into the courts.

At a motion to be heard by Ontario’s highest court, Minassian is seeking “fresh evidence” from prosecutors about Dr. Scott Woodside, the prominent CAMH forensic psychiatrist who testified that despite his autism spectrum disorder, the incel killer knew it was morally wrong when he careened down a Yonge St. sidewalk in a rented van in an attempt to kill as many women as possible in his April 2018 van attack.

Superior Court Justice Anne Molloy accepted Woodside’s expert evidence that Minassian can’t be found NCR — or not criminally responsible due to his autism — though she was critical of the psychiatrist’s lack of note-taking during his interview with Minassian.

Since his 2021 testimony, though, Woodside has run into some trouble with the courts.

A........

© Toronto Sun