Fact-based journalism that sparks the Canadian conversation

Articles Business Environment Health Politics Arts & Culture Society

Special Series Hope You’re Well For the Love of the Game Living Rooms In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration Terra Cognita More special series >

For the Love of the Game

In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration

More special series >

Events The Walrus Talks The Walrus Video Room The Walrus Leadership Roundtables The Walrus Leadership Forums Article Club

The Walrus Video Room

The Walrus Leadership Roundtables

The Walrus Leadership Forums

Subscribe Renew your subscription Change your address Magazine Issues Newsletters Podcasts

Renew your subscription

The Walrus Lab Hire The Walrus Lab Amazon First Novel Award

Amazon First Novel Award

The Most Accurately Predicted Genocide in History

There was satellite imagery, survivor testimony, and mass graves. Still, the world looked away from Sudan

The Most Accurately Predicted Genocide in History

There was satellite imagery, survivor testimony, and mass graves. Still, the world looked away from Sudan

WORDS AND PHOTOS BY MICHELLE SHEPHARD

Published 6:30, MARCH 4, 2026

We sit cross-legged on woven plastic carpets. As the punishing sun creeps toward the horizon, the sky softens into a palette of yellows and pinks, and this makeshift refugee camp in Adré, Chad, appears almost bucolic. The border with Sudan is just five kilometres away, and yet the violence unfolding there feels distant.

Isra Aldine was in high school in April 2023, living in El Fasher, the capital of Sudan’s North Darfur state, when the war broke out. President Omar al-Bashir had been overthrown four years earlier, after months of mass protests, ending decades of authoritarian rule. The unrest ebbed, but the lull was short-lived. Fighting erupted between Sudan’s paramilitary force, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). Both groups helped push al-Bashir aside—but neither trusted the other, and each expected to dominate the post-Bashir order.

The fighting drew in foreign weapons and money. Outside powers jockeyed to back a victor, secure a foothold in Sudan, and profit from its natural wealth. The country matters globally not just because of its size but because it sits on the Red Sea, a major trade route, and holds immense reserves of gold, oil, and agricultural land.

As the front lines shifted toward El Fasher, Aldine fled with her family about fifteen kilometres south, to a camp known as Zamzam for internally displaced people, or IDP. To call it a “camp” is a misnomer—by then, Zamzam was a sprawling, besieged city of more than 500,000. The SAF was in control of the area but was surrounded by the RSF, their warring rival. The RSF blocked medical supplies and food from entering the camp to further weaken SAF soldiers and the trapped civilians. Parents were forced to feed their children ambaz, a type of animal feed, until that also became scarce.

On April 11, 2025, the RSF launched a three-day frenzied assault to capture Zamzam. Controlling the territory was vital for their goal to take over Darfur, where much of the country’s wealth is centred.

“They would line people up in front of us and rape, flog, and shoot them in the middle of the street,” Aldine tells me, talking quickly as others in the shelter interrupt to add details. “We saw unimaginable things in this war.” She and her family grabbed what they could and fled. Families, including hers, were ripped apart as they tried to escape, many children separated from their parents. She was with her father and sister when they were stopped by the RSF. “They thought my father looked similar to one of the military’s soldiers, pulled him out of the tuk-tuk, and killed him right in front of us.”

The RSF fighters then mounted their “technicals”—4×4 pickup trucks that have been fitted with mounted machine guns. They took position and told the women to run. Then, they began firing. “They were shooting nonstop. Those who couldn’t escape fell dead.” Everyone in the shelter pauses as Aldine says these words. Sitting beside her is her mother, Fatima; her younger sister; and her eight-year-old brother, Abdulnasir, who escaped separately with other relatives. He stares stonily, his arm barely touching his big sister’s. Aldine will later tell me that it’s at night, as he tries to sleep, that he cries and screams.

Surviving members of Aldine’s family made it out of Zamzam to the next IDP camp in Tawila, about sixty kilometres away, where they reunited. From there, they crossed into Adré. “We spent four days unsheltered on the road, thirsty and hungry, until we got here.”

Adré was never supposed to be an official camp, but once exhausted refugees made it across the border, they stopped and set up shelters. It’s now home to over 235,000. But this is just one camp of many in Chad, a country with a struggling economy and fragile infrastructure, where more than 1.2 million Sudanese civilians now live. And Chad is itself just one of Sudan’s neighbours, sheltering its share of the millions more displaced by the war. As the conflict enters its third year, there is still no confirmed death toll. Estimates vary widely, though a former US envoy to Sudan told the New York Times he believes the number may exceed 400,000, making it the deadliest war in the world right now.

Statistics here are so overwhelming they can feel meaningless. And in a way, they are. Today’s war, if discussed at all, is often lamented as “forgotten” or “overlooked.” The United Nations’ top relief official, Tom Fletcher, categorized the lack of action as “resignation” and a “crisis of apathy.” But for those who, in the past three years, have been warning about and predicting exactly what has unfolded—the reality is far more sinister.

Sudan is a tragic example of a war that can be manipulated when independent media is scarce on the ground, when there are few consequences for war crimes, and when lucrative trade and security deals mean more than civilian lives. The war in Sudan has not been forgotten. It has been ignored.

Since fighting began between the SAF and the RSF, food systems have collapsed: farms have been abandoned, markets destroyed, and supply routes cut by checkpoints and looting. Inflation has made basic staples unaffordable, as banks close and salaries go unpaid across many areas. Aid deliveries are routinely blocked or delayed, leaving millions beyond the reach of humanitarian assistance. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the global authority on famine, uses a five-level scale to measure hunger. According to the IPC’s recent estimates, roughly 375,000 Sudanese are at phase five, or already starving. Another 6 million are at phase four, a food “emergency.” Almost half the country, some 14 million people, is at phase three—in crisis.

One reason the famine has drawn so little attention is that mass starvation kills slowly, unfolding in ways that rarely break through a crisis-driven, twenty-four-hour news cycle. Even if images of children wasting away were widely broadcast, it is hard to imagine them galvanizing a response. Such messaging—sometimes called “famine porn”—often backfires: it strips away political context and reinforces the idea that hunger in Africa is inevitable rather than a preventable, man-made strategy of war. Moral clarity seems to come more easily elsewhere. Gaza and Israel present positions to take; Ukraine offers a ready-made story of a smaller nation facing a clear aggressor, embedded........

© The Walrus