menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

The Day After the Darkness

41 0
01.03.2026

The Day After the Darkness

What if the day truly comes when Ali Khamenei is no longer leading Iran’s oppressive regime. What if the system that has exported terror, funded proxies across the Middle East, and openly called for the destruction of Israel finally collapses. Will there be a genuine regime change. Will the hundreds of thousands who supported it suddenly see the light. The light that Purim reminds us can break through even the darkest decree.

The story of Esther is not merely a children’s tale. It is a blueprint of survival in hostile times. In ancient Persia under King Ahasuerus, a young Jewish woman named Esther rose to become queen while hiding her identity. Guided by Mordecai, she faced a genocidal threat engineered by Haman. The decree to annihilate the Jews could not be revoked, but it could be countered. The Jewish people were granted the right to defend themselves. They survived because they stood together, acted courageously, and refused to accept their fate.

That is the essence of Israel.

Since 1948, Israel has faced invasion by multiple armies, waves of terror attacks, intifadas, rocket barrages, and existential threats from regimes that openly declare genocidal intent. Iran’s leadership has funded and armed Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and militias in Syria and Iraq. The nuclear ambitions of Tehran have never been about peaceful energy. They have been about leverage and intimidation. A nuclear Iran would not only threaten Israel. It would destabilize the entire region and embolden radical movements worldwide.

The irony is painful. Once, the people of Iran and the people of Israel were friends. Before the Islamic Revolution of 1979, diplomatic and economic ties flourished. Israeli engineers worked in Iran. Iranian oil flowed to Israel. There was cooperation in agriculture, technology, and security. The hostility we see today is not rooted in ancient Persian culture. It is rooted in radical ideology imposed by a theocratic regime.

So what happens the day after.

A regime change in Iran would be historic. It could open doors to normalization. It could free millions of Iranians who have protested bravely in the streets despite brutal crackdowns. It could reduce funding for terror proxies. It could remove the nuclear sword hanging over Israel’s head. For Israel, it would mean breathing space. For the region, it could mean recalibration. For the world, it would mean one less revolutionary regime seeking chaos.

But we must be realistic. Removing a regime does not instantly erase indoctrination. Millions around the world have been fed decades of propaganda portraying Israel as the ultimate villain. Social media amplifies half truths and outright lies at unprecedented speed. People who have never visited Israel, never met an Israeli, never studied the region’s history, feel entitled to pronounce moral judgment with certainty.

Peace requires more than the absence of a tyrant. It requires transformation of narratives and structures.

What are the possibilities to achieve peace.

First, education rooted in factual history. The Jewish connection to the land of Israel is documented archaeologically, biblically, and historically. Recognizing that Jews are an indigenous people to their ancestral homeland reframes the discussion. It moves it from colonial accusation to national self determination. Honest education in schools across the Middle East and beyond could slowly replace myth with fact.

Second, regional integration. The Abraham Accords proved that cooperation is possible when leadership chooses pragmatism over ideology. Agreements between Israel and several Arab states have shown tangible benefits in trade, tourism, technology, and security collaboration. If a future Iran abandons revolutionary extremism, there is no inherent reason it could not join a regional framework based on mutual benefit.

Third, economic interdependence. Prosperity reduces incentives for war. Israel has become a global leader in innovation, cybersecurity, medical research, agriculture, and water desalination. Partnerships create shared stakes. When societies benefit from stability, radicalism loses appeal. A reformed Iran with its vast natural resources and talented population could thrive in cooperation rather than confrontation.

Fourth, grassroots humanization. Exchanges between students, entrepreneurs, artists, and religious leaders can chip away at decades of demonization. Hatred thrives on distance and ignorance. Direct contact exposes complexity and shared humanity.

And yet, we must confront a harder truth. Humanity is imperfect. Competition, fear, pride, and survival instincts are powerful forces. Utopian visions often collide with reality. History shows that peace is fragile and must be defended just as sovereignty must be defended.

Peace may not be permanent. It may not be eternal. But it is possible in moments. And moments matter. Every year without war is a victory. Every child who grows up without sirens is a blessing. Every diplomatic handshake that replaces a battlefield confrontation is progress.

Israel does not seek endless conflict. It seeks security and legitimacy. It seeks the right to exist without existential threat. If the day after brings a transformed Iran, it will be welcomed not with revenge but with opportunity.

Until then, Israel will continue to do what it has always done since ancient times. Stand firm. Defend its people. Preserve its democracy in a turbulent region. Hope for light even in the darkest hour. And when moments of peace arrive, embrace them fully, knowing that even temporary peace is worth protecting.


© The Times of Israel (Blogs)