Parshat Bamidbar begins with a count. Tribe by tribe, family by family, the Torah constructs a census of remarkable precision. Yet Chazal simultaneously express discomfort with counting Jews directly, associating it with plague, vulnerability, and a kind of spiritual reductionism. The Torah counts, but it never confuses counting with control. Numbers matter, but one does not “count” morals.

A viral thought experiment circulating online presents humanity with a choice: press a blue button, and if more than half the world also presses blue, everyone survives. Press red, and if fewer than half choose blue, only the red-pressers survive. The framing is intentionally stark. Blue represents altruism; red represents selfishness. The moral conclusion is meant to feel obvious. In fact, not only is the setup less philosophically serious than it first appears, it ultimately lies somewhere between psychological gaslighting and blackmail, with little if any intellectual salience.

At first glance, the discussion seems to concern the participants: who is noble enough to risk themselves for humanity? Yet the more fundamental moral – or, not to put too fine a point on it, in this case, immoral – actor is the designer of the scenario itself, who has imposed an artificial, coercive system onto the world and then framed compliance with that system as virtue. The morality........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)