Certainty is the analyst’s greatest trap. The willingness to keep asking is the mark of intellectual honesty.

In my work with people, what I kept noticing was this. Those who erred most seriously were not wrong about the things they were uncertain of. They were wrong about the things they were most sure of. Certainty does not protect us from error. It prevents us from seeing it and yet we are rewarded, professionally and culturally, for appearing to already know. Jewish tradition refuses that reward. It does not treat certainty as wisdom. It treats the open question as a form of integrity.

In Shemot 24:7, Moses reads the Book of the Covenant aloud to the people. They respond, “All that HaShem has spoken we will do and we will hear.“ Na’aseh ve-nishma. The sequence is everything. First we will do, then we will understand. Not: understand first, then commit. The Western rational tradition teaches that comprehension must precede action. Na’aseh ve-nishma says something different, understanding does not wait at the door. It comes from inside. It is born from the doing.

The Talmud records what followed those words (Shabbat 88a). Rabbi Eliezer taught, when the Israelites rushed to say “we will do” before “we will........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)