An antisemitic conspiracy theory does not begin with evidence. It begins with need.

A country fails. Its ruling party hollows out institutions, public services collapse, borders turn performative, police lose authority, and unemployment becomes generational. African migrants are threatened by other Africans on African soil, and the state cannot or will not protect them until the danger becomes internationally embarrassing. At that point the ruling class goes looking for an explanation that does not require a mirror. Not corruption, not the ANC, not state decay, not lawlessness, not Afrophobia, not the long betrayal of South Africa’s democratic promise. A Jew.

That is how it begins. I now sit near the center of the latest South African edition of the worldwide Jewish conspiracy. The country has every one of these failures. Somehow the hidden hand is me: Jews, Israel, The Times of Israel, Mossad, Zionists, “Empire,” Elon Musk, bots, algorithms, and whatever other ghost is required to spare the ANC from responsibility. The accusation is not serious because it is true. It is serious because it is useful.

My article, Africa Must Fragment, South Africa First, argued about sovereignty, state failure, inherited colonial borders, and democratic self-determination. It did not argue for attacks on migrants, instruct mobs, fund vigilantes, or create South Africa’s unemployment, corruption, border failure, or Afrophobia. It asked whether failed post-colonial states should be treated as sacred prisons when they deny identity, security, consent, and competent government to the peoples trapped inside them. The conspiratorial mind did not need the article to say any of that. It needed the article to exist. A Jew had written, an Israeli platform had published, the word “fragment” appeared, and the rest could be manufactured.

I publish in The Times of Israel because the platform gave me a blog long before I had heard of Substack. I built a readership there, and I keep writing on Lithuania’s Holocaust distortion, Jewish continuity, South Africa, sovereignty, recognition doctrine, antisemitism, Afrophobia, Somaliland, Mthwakazi, and the political uses of history. The platform is public, the byline is public, and the record is not hidden. That should end the matter. It does not, because conspiracy theory does not respect distinctions. Author becomes publisher, publisher becomes state, state becomes intelligence service, argument becomes operation, operation becomes Jewish plot. No fact has entered the room. None is needed. The accusation has already done its work.

The proximate Jew as alibi, the proximate Jew as culprit

Joanne Strasser recently described one form of this mechanism in The Ease of Antisemitism. She called it the “proximate Jew as alibi”: the Jewish spouse, dissenter, or witness produced to make a charge against Jews or Israel feel safe. A Jewish wife says “yes, it is genocide,” and the speaker feels pre-acquitted. The Jew is not engaged as a reasoning person. The Jew is used as a credential.

What has happened to me is the companion structure: the proximate Jew as culprit. In Strasser’s case, Jewishness is conscripted to validate an accusation. In mine, to manufacture one. A Jewish spouse can bless a genocide theory that does not exist; a Jewish writer, a foreign-operation theory that does not exist. In both, the conclusion comes first, and then the Jew is found and made to do the work evidence cannot.

This is affinity fraud with prejudice as the asset. Ordinary affinity fraud builds trust through a shared identity. Here suspicion is built through a hostile one. The audience is not asked to inspect evidence but to recognize signals: Jew, Israel, Mossad, The Times of Israel, fragmentation, Bantustans, bots, Empire, Zionists. The chain is not logical. It is associative, doing the work proof cannot.

The........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)