How Do You Negotiate Hormuz and Neutralize Pickaxe Mountain at the Same Time?
It cannot be done. Not this way, not that way, not some clever third way nobody has thought of . Not with more time. Not with more money. Not with a better negotiator in the room. Not in this life, not in the next, and if it existed, not in an alternate universe. There is no version of this that works.
The arithmetic is brutal. For the American position to hold, two mutually exclusive realities must coexist. First, the strait must reopen, meaning the naval blockade ends, the oil waiver returns, and Washington stops threatening airstrikes. Second, the Pickaxe mountain must be neutralized; the very same mountain that Trump himself promised to “take out” in a radio interview just weeks ago.
But true neutralization requires smashing the regime’s military apparatus until it is forced to completely abandon both its nuclear program and its grip on the strait. You cannot stretch one policy instrument across two opposing goals.
If the United States caves on Hormuz, it inevitably caves on the reason the war started in the first place: the principle that Iran can never possess nuclear weapons. This implies leaving Pickaxe mountain exactly as it is, surrendering to a fait accompli. In mathematics, this is an inconsistent system: it has no solution at all.
Details emerging from the Muscat talks show that the proposed framework asks Iran to use its “best efforts” to ensure the safe passage of commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, the same waterway Iran heavily restricted and at times declared closed during the conflict. It’s essentially a grace period on an illegal toll.
Deeper in the........
