At last week’s Labor conference, which was totally under the Prime Minister’s thumb, only one issue was contested on the floor – support for the use of telehealth in voluntary assisted dying care.

The amendment in favour passed, but Anthony Albanese later flagged he was opposed to such a move.

The measure would require changing the criminal code, which prohibits using a carriage service to promote or counsel on suicide.

On the conference floor, Attorney-General Michelle Rowland expressed strong concerns.

Now, hard on the heels of the conference decision, Albanese is to be put on the spot. Will he respect, or flout, the will of what is supposed to be Labor’s peak body?

Crossbencher Kate Chaney, from Western Australia, who is one of the teals independents, already has a private member’s bill on the notice paper that would remove the ban on the use of telehealth.

Chaney has written this week to Rowland, with copies to Albanese and leader of the House of Representatives Tony Burke, saying she will seek a suspension of standing orders to bring on her bill when parliament resumes on Tuesday week.

“People are enduring exhausting and painful travel to access VAD. Every week this anomaly remains unaddressed is a week in which that needless suffering continues,” she writes.

“The fix in my Bill is simple: an amendment to the Commonwealth Criminal Code to make clear that lawful VAD care is not suicide.”

Chaney refers to a related resolution the Labor conference passed, saying any decision reached on VAD “is not binding on any member of the party”.

“I would ask that the Government........

© The New Daily