Chief Justice John Roberts has always been "a man more sinned against than sinning." That line from Shakespeare's "King Lear" seems increasingly apt for the head of our highest court.

Roberts was installed almost exactly 20 years ago and soon found himself grappling with a series of controversies that have rocked the court as an institution.

He is now faced with another monumental scandal, after the New York Times published leaked confidential information that could only have come from one of the nine members of the Court.

By most accounts, Roberts is popular with his colleagues and someone with an unquestioning institutional knowledge and loyalty. He is, in many respects, the ideal Chief Justice: engaging, empathetic, and unfailingly respectful of the court's justices and staff.

Roberts has been chief justice during some of the court's most contentious times. Major decisions like overturning Roe v. Wade (which Roberts sought to avoid) have galvanized many against the court.

According to recent polling, fewer than half of Americans (47 percent) hold a favorable opinion of the court (51 percent have an unfavorable view). Of course, that level of support should inspire envy in the court's critics in the Congress (18 percent approval) and the media (which only 32 percent trust).

Some, however, want to express their dissatisfaction more directly and even permanently. This week, an Alaskan man, Panos Anastasiou, 76, was indicted with 22 federal charges for threatening to torture and kill the six conservative justices.

Another man, Nicolas Roske, 28, will go on trial next June for attempting to assassinate Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

© The Hill