menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Falling crime and a strong border haven't lifted Trump's ratings — why not?

8 0
26.02.2026

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement

Technology Newsletter

NEWS Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News

POLICY Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability

BUSINESS Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying

OPINION Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content

All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House

Opinions – Civil Rights

Opinions – Criminal Justice

Opinions – Cybersecurity

Opinions – Energy and Environment

Opinions – Healthcare

Opinions – Immigration

Opinions – International

Opinions – National Security

Opinions – Technology

Opinions – White House

Submit Opinion Content

EVENTS Upcoming Events About

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Content from Google Cloud

Opinion Falling crime and a strong border haven’t lifted Trump’s ratings — why not? Opinions - White House | 1 minute ago

Opinion Orban and Fico: Putin’s NATO pawns Opinions - National Security | 31 minutes ago

Instagram launches new tool alerting parents about suicide, self-harm searches Technology | 31 minutes ago

Trump keeps world guessing on Iran Morning Report | 48 minutes ago

High school walkouts over ICE stir debates among parents, officials Education | 1 hour ago

Where redistricting battles stand in key states as midterms ramp up Campaign | 1 hour ago

Democrats conflicted over Trump’s Iran push Senate | 1 hour ago

Trump adds pressure on Thune to pass voting bill despite ‘talking filibuster’ misgivings Senate | 1 hour ago

Falling crime and a strong border haven’t lifted Trump’s ratings — why not?

Stand in a grocery store checkout line, and the last few years show up on the receipt. Inflation has cooled dramatically from its peak. Economists are right about that. Prices are no longer rising at the pace they were two years ago. But the total at the bottom of the receipt still hits hard. Lower inflation means slower increases — not a return to earlier costs. Families reorganized budgets. They absorbed the shock, and the memory of strain remains. Now consider the broader picture. On paper, the shifts of the past year are significant. Inflation has fallen sharply. The stock market has returned to record territory. Unemployment remains historically low. Gas prices are down from the highs that rattled households. At the southern border, the operational reality looks markedly different from four years ago, when major enforcement policies were reversed and programs like “Remain in Mexico” were ended. At that time, incentives shifted, crossings surged and the system strained visibly. Americans watched images of overwhelmed facilities and chaotic crossings and formed an impression that ran deep. Today, encounters are dramatically lower. Enforcement is much tighter. The border is more controlled than it has been in years. The difference is operational and measurable. Violent crime tells a similar story. After the pandemic-era spike that sent homicide rates soaring, national data and reporting from major metropolitan areas show one of the steepest year-over-year declines in decades. In several large cities, murders have fallen at double-digit rates. Lives that might have been lost were not. Neighborhoods that felt unstable are experiencing relief. These are consequential reversals. And yet presidential approval remains underwater. For President Trump, this disconnect between measurable progress and public approval reveals something deeper about how leadership is processed in modern America. The old equation was straightforward: Improve conditions, and voters will reward you. Restore order, and confidence will follow. Deliver economic stability, and approval rises. But that equation is no longer automatic. Most Americans are not blind to improvement. They understand the border is more controlled than during the period of peak disorder. They see crime statistics trending downward. They know inflation is no longer surging. But acknowledgment is not the same as trust. Instability leaves an imprint. Families adjust finances. Communities adapt to disruption. Voters form conclusions about competence and direction long before conditions stabilize. When order returns, it does not erase memory overnight. Then there’s tone. Trump isn’t merely a policy actor — he is a polarizing presence. Supporters view confrontation as strength. Opponents experience it as provocation. The intensity of opposition toward him is extraordinary, and his rhetoric has consistently supplied fuel for it. Tone does not negate policy gains, but it shapes whether those gains expand confidence beyond the base. Escalation energizes loyalty, but it rarely broadens trust. Republican leaders often operate within that same confrontational current. Democratic leaders face a different temptation: to treat improvement as irrelevant if acknowledging it risks validating an opponent. When border encounters drop sharply, the instinct is often to emphasize what remains broken rather than what has changed. When crime falls, the response is to question the data or shift focus elsewhere. Both instincts narrow the field. One mistakes intensity for persuasion. The other mistakes resistance for principle. The result is a paradox. A president can preside over falling homicide rates, sharply reduced border encounters, cooling inflation, and strong employment, and still struggle to expand approval beyond hardened lines. The improvements remain significant. Lower homicide rates save lives. Reduced border encounters alter operational realities. Cooling inflation eases pressure. Strong employment expands opportunity. But results do not interpret themselves. Leadership is not only about producing results. It’s about helping people make sense of them. It’s about connecting statistics to lived experience. It’s about projecting steadiness in posture as well as policy. In a polarized era, performance alone does not carry the day. Story matters more than statistics. For Republicans, that means translating policy wins into the language of stability rather than grievance and allowing governance, at least occasionally, to step out of campaign mode. For Democrats, it means competing on future vision rather than permanent alarm. When measurable improvements occur, acknowledging them strengthens credibility rather than weakening opposition. American history offers perspective. The country has endured volatility before. Markets rebound. Crime recedes. Border flows shift. Institutions adjust. The open question is whether leaders adjust with the same discipline. Progress matters. But today, people follow more than performance. They follow the story that helps them make sense of change, and the tone that tells them whether stability is real. Governing well remains essential. Helping a divided nation believe what has improved may be the harder task. Jeff Evans is a political consultant, leadership communications advisor, and author of “Storytelling for Leadership and Influence.”

Stand in a grocery store checkout line, and the last few years show up on the receipt.

Inflation has cooled dramatically from its peak. Economists are right about that. Prices are no longer rising at the pace they were two years ago. But the total at the bottom of the receipt still hits hard. Lower inflation means slower increases — not a return to earlier costs. Families reorganized budgets. They absorbed the shock, and the memory of strain remains.

Now consider the broader picture. On paper, the shifts of the past year are significant. Inflation has fallen sharply. The stock market has returned to record territory. Unemployment remains historically low. Gas prices are down from the highs that rattled households.

At the southern border, the operational reality looks markedly different from four years ago, when major enforcement policies were reversed and programs like “Remain in Mexico” were ended. At that time, incentives shifted, crossings surged and the system strained visibly. Americans watched images of overwhelmed facilities and chaotic crossings and formed an impression that ran deep.

Today, encounters are dramatically lower. Enforcement is much tighter. The border is more controlled than it has been in years. The difference is operational and measurable.

Violent crime tells a similar story. After the pandemic-era spike that sent homicide rates soaring, national data and reporting from major metropolitan areas show one of the steepest year-over-year declines in decades. In several large cities, murders have fallen at double-digit rates. Lives that might have been lost were not. Neighborhoods that felt unstable are experiencing relief.

These are consequential reversals. And yet presidential approval remains underwater.

For President Trump, this disconnect between measurable progress and public approval reveals something deeper about how leadership is processed in modern America.

The old equation was straightforward: Improve conditions, and voters will reward you. Restore order, and confidence will follow. Deliver economic stability, and approval rises.

But that equation is no longer automatic.

Most Americans are not blind to improvement. They understand the border is more controlled than during the period of peak disorder. They see crime statistics trending downward. They know inflation is no longer surging. But acknowledgment is not the same as trust.

Instability leaves an imprint. Families adjust finances. Communities adapt to disruption. Voters form conclusions about competence and direction long before conditions stabilize. When order returns, it does not erase memory overnight.

Then there’s tone. Trump isn’t merely a policy actor — he is a polarizing presence. Supporters view confrontation as strength. Opponents experience it as provocation. The intensity of opposition toward him is extraordinary, and his rhetoric has consistently supplied fuel for it.

Tone does not negate policy gains, but it shapes whether those gains expand confidence beyond the base. Escalation energizes loyalty, but it rarely broadens trust.

Republican leaders often operate within that same confrontational current. Democratic leaders face a different temptation: to treat improvement as irrelevant if acknowledging it risks validating an opponent. When border encounters drop sharply, the instinct is often to emphasize what remains broken rather than what has changed. When crime falls, the response is to question the data or shift focus elsewhere.

Both instincts narrow the field. One mistakes intensity for persuasion. The other mistakes resistance for principle.

The result is a paradox. A president can preside over falling homicide rates, sharply reduced border encounters, cooling inflation, and strong employment, and still struggle to expand approval beyond hardened lines.

The improvements remain significant. Lower homicide rates save lives. Reduced border encounters alter operational realities. Cooling inflation eases pressure. Strong employment expands opportunity.

But results do not interpret themselves.

Leadership is not only about producing results. It’s about helping people make sense of them. It’s about connecting statistics to lived experience. It’s about projecting steadiness in posture as well as policy.

In a polarized era, performance alone does not carry the day. Story matters more than statistics. For Republicans, that means translating policy wins into the language of stability rather than grievance and allowing governance, at least occasionally, to step out of campaign mode.

For Democrats, it means competing on future vision rather than permanent alarm. When measurable improvements occur, acknowledging them strengthens credibility rather than weakening opposition.

American history offers perspective. The country has endured volatility before. Markets rebound. Crime recedes. Border flows shift. Institutions adjust.

The open question is whether leaders adjust with the same discipline. Progress matters. But today, people follow more than performance. They follow the story that helps them make sense of change, and the tone that tells them whether stability is real.

Governing well remains essential. Helping a divided nation believe what has improved may be the harder task.

Jeff Evans is a political consultant, leadership communications advisor, and author of “Storytelling for Leadership and Influence.”

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Opinions - White House News

Omar says her State of the Union guest was arrested for standing during ...

Crockett up by double digits in Texas Senate Democratic primary poll

Vance, Oz announce pause in Medicaid funds to Minnesota amid fraud probe

Wall Street Journal: ‘Smart play’ would have been for Trump to forgo, pause ...

Trump adds pressure on Thune to pass voting bill despite ‘talking ...

Fetterman on Democrats ‘yelling and screaming’ during Trump ...

House appears on track to defeat resolution curbing Trump’s war powers in Iran

Senate Democrats emerge from secret Iran briefing warning of ...

Durbin whistleblowers accuse Patel of jet usage, decisionmaking that hindered ...

Whitmer says US-Canada bridge Trump threatened to block ‘will open’

Pennsylvania Democrats win state House special elections, keeping majority ...

Bessent on new Trump retirement plan: ‘We can do it through reconciliation’

Cornyn: Democrat winning Senate race in Texas would be ‘first crack in the ...

‘El Mencho’ killing signals volatile new chapter in Mexico’s drug war

Former Air Force pilot who provided ‘defense services’ to Chinese ...

Applebee’s closing restaurants in 3 states

Gorsuch takes aim at fellow Supreme Court justices in tariff decision

‘Major’ wave of seaweed heading toward these beaches ahead of spring break

The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report

2024 Election Results

2024 Election Forecast

Regulation - Administration

Energy & Environment Video Clips

Health Care Video Clips

Technology Video Clips

Transportation Video Clips

International Video Clips

Cybersecurity Video Clips

National Security Video Clips

Contributors to The Hill

Submit Opinion Content

PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025

Advertise with Nexstar

Journalistic Integrity

THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002

© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Check your email inbox

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Thanks for registering!

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Are you sure you want to log out?


© The Hill