menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Members’ video raises issues of sedition and free speech

21 0
26.02.2026

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement

Technology Newsletter

NEWS Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News

POLICY Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability

BUSINESS Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying

OPINION Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content

All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House

Opinions – Civil Rights

Opinions – Criminal Justice

Opinions – Cybersecurity

Opinions – Energy and Environment

Opinions – Healthcare

Opinions – Immigration

Opinions – International

Opinions – National Security

Opinions – Technology

Opinions – White House

Submit Opinion Content

EVENTS Upcoming Events About

Sign Up Account Profile Log Out

Hillary Clinton deposition

Content from Google Cloud

Opinion Members’ video raises issues of sedition and free speech Congress Blog | 13 minutes ago

Majorities back Trump on deportations, but oppose methods: Survey Administration | 16 minutes ago

FDA announces recall of cottage cheese sold at Walmart in 24 states Health Care | 26 minutes ago

Opinion The US must act now to secure the Baltic from Russia Opinions - International | 43 minutes ago

World Economic Forum chief resigns after Epstein ties revealed International | 46 minutes ago

Most doubt Trump judgment on use of military force abroad amid Iran tensions: Poll Administration | 54 minutes ago

Live updates: US, Iran look for common ground in Geneva talks; Hillary Clinton faces Epstein questions Administration | 1 hour ago

DOJ reviewing whether any Epstein records withheld after reports of missing Trump-related documents Administration | 1 hour ago

Members’ video raises issues of sedition and free speech

Last Nov. 18, six members of Congress — all Democrats and all former military or intelligence veterans — posted a 90-second video in which they urged active military personnel to not obey illegal orders.

The six members included Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), and Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.), Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.).

They knew exactly what they were doing. Although the video was not explicit about what illegal orders they had in mind, it is generally understood they were incensed by President Trump’s decisions to bomb alleged drug-running boats in the Caribbean and to deploy National Guard troops in American cities to help round-up illegal immigrants. 

Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice makes clear that service members must obey lawful orders or face potential serious punishment, including court martial. The article also makes clear that members of the armed forces may not only refuse to obey a manifestly illegal order, but have a duty to do so. The courts have held that for an order to be considered manifestly illegal, the unlawfulness must be clear and obvious, such as targeting civilians.

The six video contributors were quite aware that their social media posting would likely anger Trump. Two days later, on Nov. 20, the president lashed out at the lawmakers, saying they should be arrested and tried for sedition: “TRAITORS!!! LOCK THEM UP?????.” In a subsequent post the president left no doubt as to where he stood: “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH.”

Trump’s outrage was quickly absorbed by his loyal lieutenants at the departments of Justice and Defense. At Justice, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro convened a grand jury to indict the six members for their conduct. Due to grand jury secrecy, the specific charges were not made known, even to the accused members. In short order, though, the 20-person grand jury rejected Pirro’s request for an indictment.

Meantime, the Department of Defense was going full bore on investigating and punishing Kelly, but not the other five members. As Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth explained, Kelly was the only one of the six who had “formally” retired and therefore was subject to being recalled to duty and punished, even though his alleged offenses occurred after his retirement.

On Jan. 5, Hegseth issued a “Secretarial Letter of Censure” to Kelly, based on a determination that he had exhibited conduct that is “prejudicial to good order and discipline in the Armed Forces…and [is] unbecoming an officer.”

Although the Defense secretary downplayed the seriousness of the censure letter as “a necessary process step” to proceedings that could lead to Kelly’s demotion in rank and retirement pay, it is clear from the Code of Military Justice that censure is, in fact, already a finding of guilt and form of punishment.   

In the censure letter Hegseth elaborated on numerous instances in which Kelly had been critical of administration policies, and accused “me and senior military officers of war crimes and to frame resistance to lawful orders….”

Hegseth concluded his censure letter by informing Kelly of his “right to submit a written rebuttal. … However, you do not have a right to appeal this administrative action.” After receiving a recommendation from the secretary of the Navy, Hegseth said a determination would be made as to whether Kelly’s rank as captain would be reduced, and, with it, his commensurate retirement benefits.

Kelly circumvented the meaningless rebuttal that would go nowhere other than into his personal file, and instead filed in the U.S. District Court for D.C. his motion that the censure be blocked. On Feb. 12, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, blocked the Pentagon’s censure, based primarily on grounds that Kelly’s free speech rights had been violated: “This court has all it needs to conclude that defendants have trampled on Senator Kelly’s First Amendment freedoms and threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees.”  

Hegseth appealed the ruling on Tuesday. Interestingly, Kelly did not emphasize in his own defense his immunity as a senator from being questioned in any other place for any “speech or debate” relating to his official duties in Congress. Moreover, Judge Leon did not highlight that constitutional shield members of Congress enjoy.

While that additional argument may have some bearing on appeal, Leon and Kelly wanted to make clear that the more important issue is in protecting all Americans from government retribution for their public utterances.

Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran culminating as chief of staff of the House Rules Committee in1995. He is author of, “Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial” (2000), and, “Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays” (2018).   

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Congress Blog News

Omar says her State of the Union guest was arrested for standing during ...

Crockett up by double digits in Texas Senate Democratic primary poll

Whitmer says US-Canada bridge Trump threatened to block ‘will open’

Vance, Oz announce pause in Medicaid funds to Minnesota amid fraud probe

4 killed in speedboat were trying to infiltrate Cuba, officials say

Trump adds pressure on Thune to pass voting bill despite ‘talking ...

Wall Street Journal: ‘Smart play’ would have been for Trump to forgo, pause ...

House appears on track to defeat resolution curbing Trump’s war powers in Iran

‘El Mencho’ killing signals volatile new chapter in Mexico’s drug war

US women’s hockey team captain: Trump joke ‘distasteful’

Fetterman on Democrats ‘yelling and screaming’ during Trump ...

Where redistricting battles stand in key states as midterms ramp up

Durbin whistleblowers accuse Patel of jet usage, decisionmaking that hindered ...

Live updates: US, Iran look for common ground in Geneva talks; Hillary Clinton ...

DOJ reviewing whether any Epstein records withheld after reports of missing ...

Pennsylvania Democrats win state House special elections, keeping majority ...

Cornyn: Democrat winning Senate race in Texas would be ‘first crack in the ...

Bessent on new Trump retirement plan: ‘We can do it through reconciliation’

The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report

2024 Election Results

2024 Election Forecast

Regulation - Administration

Energy & Environment Video Clips

Health Care Video Clips

Technology Video Clips

Transportation Video Clips

International Video Clips

Cybersecurity Video Clips

National Security Video Clips

Contributors to The Hill

Submit Opinion Content

PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025

Advertise with Nexstar

Journalistic Integrity

THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002

© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Check your email inbox

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Thanks for registering!

Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.

Are you sure you want to log out?


© The Hill