SCOTUS To Decide Whether Rogue Judges Can Sideline Constitution To Oust Their Colleague
1 Trending: Here Are The Biggest Outstanding Supreme Court Cases To Keep An Eye Out For
2 Trending: Feminists’ ‘Unequivocal’ Support For Graham Platner Proves They Love Abortion More Than Women
3 Trending: California Allows Late Ballots With No Postmark — That’s An Invitation To Fraud
4 Trending: Report: California’s Partnership With The CCP To Undermine American Energy May Be Illegal
SCOTUS To Decide Whether Rogue Judges Can Sideline Constitution To Oust Their Colleague
‘Every judge who gets crosswise with her chief judge or her colleagues must now worry whether similar tactics could be used to remove them.’
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
Pauline Newman was first appointed to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals by President Reagan in 1984. At 98 years old, she is currently the oldest active federal judge in the United States — that is, unless her opponents get their way.
During its Thursday conference, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether to take up a case (Newman v. Moore) involving efforts by Newman’s judicial colleagues to effectively sideline the Constitution to kick her off the bench. Article III of America’s founding legal document grants federal judges lifetime appointments and states that they can only be removed by Congress via impeachment and conviction.
Newman’s decades of public service came under siege in early 2023 when her court — led by Chief Judge Kimberly Moore — launched an investigation into the Reagan appointee’s mental fitness over alleged concerns of cognitive and physical decline. According........
