1 Trending: Supreme Court Makes It Clear. Mass Deportations Are Mandatory To Save America

2 Trending: McCarthyism Didn’t Go Far Enough To Root Out Filthy Commies, So Now We Have Modern NYC

3 Trending: SCOTUS Smacks Down Limits On Political Party-Candidate Spending Coordination

4 Trending: After SCOTUS Citizenship Ruling, National Security Requires A Travel Ban On CCP Nationals

SCOTUS Will Decide Constitutionality Of So-Called ‘Assault Weapons’ Bans

In their appeal, the plaintiffs argue that ‘the very term “assault weapon” is a political slogan masquerading as a meaningful designation.’

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

On the heels of a big Second Amendment victory for gun owners in Hawaii, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will hear two cases challenging state and local “assault weapons” bans later this year.

The cases dispute laws in Illinois and Connecticut, questioning the constitutionality of banning “AR-15 platform and similar semi-automatic rifles” under the Second and 14th Amendments. Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County will be heard together in the Supreme Court’s October 2026 term.

Democrats like Kamala Harris have recently called for a federal ban on assault weapons, which she calls “weapons of war” that “have no place on the streets of civil society.” One of the major problems with that proposition is that Americans have no idea what Democrats mean by “assault weapons.” Even former President........

© The Federalist