1 Trending: Boomers Should Give Their Life’s Earnings To Their Kids, Not Making A Slow Death Last Longer

2 Trending: Princeton Study Shows How Bad Actors Can Exploit Georgia Elections To Expose How You Voted

3 Trending: Gavin Newsom’s Bungled High-Speed Rail Project Includes Zero Trains

4 Trending: The Average Man Rejected Socialism. White Affluent Liberals Chose It For Him

Daughters Of American Revolution President Squashes Another Attempt To Preserve The Org’s Female-Only Charge

In latest letter, DAR President reassures that the org’s betrayal of its female-centric mission and the members who care about it continues.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The women fighting to protect the National Society Daughters of the American Revolution’s female-only membership received another blow this week after DAR President General Ginnie Sebastian Storage refused chapters’ requests for a special session to vote on the definition of “woman.”

The August 6 rejection, published to the DAR Members’ Website and distributed to members by at least one state regent, suggests DAR national leadership, led by Storage, is committed to accommodating men at the expense its members, including thousands of whom departed over the DAR’s years-long abandonment of its female-centric mission.

“The National Society’s representative body has already fully considered and decided the proposed resolution,” Storage wrote. “Article VIII does not require the President General to convene that body only months later to take another vote on the identical resolution. Accordingly, no additional special meeting will be convened.”

Storage acknowledged that the requests for a special session stemmed “from chapters that previously sought an October special meeting, as well as requests from some additional chapters.” She concluded, however, that indulging those requests “is neither required by the National Bylaws nor consistent with the governance responsibilities of the President General” after the national society vote earlier this year.

A previous attempt to limit membership........

© The Federalist