1 Trending: Trump’s Declassified Docs Detail Massive Michigan Voter Registration Fraud

2 Trending: Rather Than Back Down, Trump Must Escalate His Campaign For Mass Deportations

3 Trending: DC’s Newest Museum Tells Tale Of National Geographic’s Tragic Fall From Patriot Explorers To Globalism Activists

4 Trending: 7 Ways DSA Plans To Turn America Into A Third-World Communist Country

Democrats Can’t Explain Their Hatred Of Voter ID. Unfortunately, Republicans Won’t Make Them

Imagine Democrats trying to justify — hour after hour — their opposition to photo ID and making sure voters are citizens before voting on the Senate floor?

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., struggled to explain his opposition to one of the most basic, common sense provisions of the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, that is, photo ID to vote, during an interview with ABC News. The exchange proved just how little substance there is behind Democrats’ crusade against the SAVE America Act — and why Republicans must force a floor vote that makes every Democrat senator (and some Republicans) defend that opposition on record.

ABC’s Jonathan Karl asked Warner whether Democrats should support national photo ID requirements for both voting registration and voting itself.

“Now, I understand that you and I think every other Democrat opposed this so-called SAVE America Act. And there’s a lot of reasons that you’ve put forward. But let me ask you very narrowly on the issue of photo ID, requiring photo ID to register to vote,” Karl began. “Is this something that Democrats should get behind?”

Karl then cited data showing Americans on both sides of the aisle overwhelmingly support photo ID to vote. Notably, polling shows documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote, which is part of the SAVE America Act, is also popular.

Warner then avoided the question and claimed Virginia has “voter ID and photo ID,” but Karl cut him off.

“That’s actually not the........

© The Federalist