Trans-Pacific View | Economy | Security | East Asia

Trump’s New AI Order Raises the Stakes in China-US Tech Competition

Advanced AI models are no longer treated simply as commercial products; they are increasingly regarded as strategic assets linked to national power.

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks at a press conference at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, Jan. 3, 2026.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s new executive order on artificial intelligence (AI) signals a sharper strategic turn in Washington’s technology policy. The order brings the U.S. national security state closer to the companies developing AI models. Its core purpose is to preserve U.S. innovation while ensuring that the most powerful AI capabilities support U.S. cyber defense, critical infrastructure and strategic competition with China. The result may be a more divided global AI order, with Chinese models facing growing scrutiny over security, data and political alignment.

From Risk Management to Strategic Competition

Trump’s order “promoting advanced artificial intelligence innovation and security,” released on June 2, appears at first glance to be a regulatory document. It establishes a framework for identifying protected frontier models, encourages voluntary cooperation between companies and federal agencies, and strengthens the use of AI in cyber defense.

But the order is more than an attempt to manage the risks of new technology. It is a statement about how Washington now understands AI in the context of China-U.S. competition. Advanced AI models are no longer treated simply as commercial products or tools for productivity. They are increasingly regarded as strategic assets linked to national power.

This marks a clear shift in the direction of U.S. AI governance. During the Biden administration, AI policy placed considerable emphasis on privacy, discrimination, consumer protection, misinformation and model safety. National security concerns were present, but they sat alongside a wider social risk agenda.

Trump’s new order gives priority to a different concern. It places innovation, cyber security and geopolitical competition at the center of AI policy. The logic is close to Trump’s first term approach in the 2019 American AI Initiative. AI leadership depends on research, capital, computing power, talent, and standards. Excessive regulation, in this view, risks weakening the very ecosystem that gives the U.S. its advantage.

Frontier AI Models as National Security Assets

The order therefore accepts two realities. The first is that frontier AI models now carry national security consequences. This is why the National Security Agency and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency have such prominent roles in the order. The main concern is not general AI ethics. It is whether the most advanced models can improve cyberattack capabilities, expose critical infrastructure to new risks, or be used by hostile actors.

The order asks U.S. agencies to develop a classified evaluation system for advanced AI models with high level cyber capabilities. It also allows companies to give the government early access to models before wider release. This is presented as a voluntary process, not a compulsory approval mechanism.

This design is important. Washington wants earlier insight into the capabilities of frontier models, but it does not want to create a formal licensing regime. The administration appears to believe that formal approval would damage the speed of AI development. In a sector where progress can occur in months, delay itself becomes a strategic cost.

This is the second reality underpinning the order: that an arduous approval system could slow American innovation and strengthen China’s relative position.

This is also where the U.S. approach differs from the European Union’s AI governance model. The EU has placed greater weight on risk classification and legal compliance. The Trump administration has chosen a more flexible framework. It seeks closer government access to........

© The Diplomat